New Delhi, March 24 (IANS) The Supreme Court judgment delivered by Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice R.F. Nariman on Tuesday is likely to go down as a landmark in the history of jurisprudence in India.
The earlier Congress government which brought in Section 66A as an amendment to the Information Technology Act in 2009, and the incumbent government of the BJP which argued for continuation of the section, attempted to take away the freedom of the citizens enshrined under the Constitution. This is clear from the wordings of the judges.
Following are excerpts from the judgment:
“The Preamble of the Constitution of India inter alia speaks of liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship. It also says that India is a sovereign democratic republic. It cannot be over emphasized that when it comes to democracy, liberty of thought and expression is a cardinal value that is of paramount significance under our constitutional scheme.”
“It is clear that Section 66A arbitrarily, excessively and disproportionately invades the right of free speech and upsets the balance between such right and the reasonable restrictions that may be imposed on such right.”
“If Section 66A is otherwise invalid, it cannot be saved by an assurance from the learned Additional Solicitor General that it will be administered in a reasonable manner. Governments may come and Governments may go but Section 66A goes on forever. An assurance from the present Government even if carried out faithfully would not bind any successor Government. It must, therefore, be held that Section 66A must be judged on its own merits without any reference to how well it may be administered.”
“Section 66A does not fall within any of the subject matters contained in Article 19(2) and the possibility of its being applied for purposes outside those subject matters is clear. We therefore hold that no part of Section 66A is severable and the provision as a whole must be declared unconstitutional.”
“It is thus clear that not only are the expressions used in Section 66A expressions of inexactitude but they are also over broad and would fall foul of the repeated injunctions of this Court that restrictions on the freedom of speech must be couched in the narrowest possible terms.”
“Vague laws offend several important values. First, because we assume that man is free to steer between lawful and unlawful conduct, we insist that laws give the person of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited, so that he may act accordingly. Vague laws may trap the innocent by not providing fair warning."
“Second, if arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement is to be prevented, laws must provide explicit standards for those who apply them. A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges, and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application.”
“Information that may be grossly offensive or which causes annoyance or inconvenience are undefined terms which take into the net a very large amount of protected and innocent speech.”
“Section 66A does not concern itself with injury to reputation. Something may be grossly offensive and may annoy or be inconvenient to somebody without at all affecting his reputation. It is clear therefore that the Section is not aimed at defamatory statements at all.”
“Section 66A has no proximate connection with incitement to commit an offence. Firstly, the information disseminated over the internet need not be information which “incites” anybody at all. Written words may be sent that may be purely in the realm of “discussion” or “advocacy” of a “particular point of view”. Further, the mere causing of annoyance, inconvenience, danger, etc., or being grossly offensive or having a menacing character are not offences under the Penal Code at all.”
The judges quoted with approval Justice L.D. Brandeis of the US Supreme Court in his famous concurring judgment in Whitney v. California.
Justice Brandeis wrote: “Fear of serious injury cannot alone justify suppression of free speech and assembly. Men feared witches and burnt women. It is the function of speech to free men from the bondage of irrational fears."
"To justify suppression of free speech there must be reasonable ground to fear that serious evil will result if free speech is practiced. There must be reasonable ground to believe that the danger apprehended is imminent. There must be reasonable ground to believe that the evil to be prevented is a serious one.”
Kejriwal hails 66A scrapping
New Delhi, March 24 (IANS) Delhi's activist-turned-Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Tuesday described the scrapping of section 66A by the Supreme Court "a big day for freedom of speech and
Gyanvapi Case: 'The decision will be taken if it becomes clear whose possession it was before 1993', High Court said this big thing in Vyas ji's basement case
The fact of who occupied the basement of Vyas ji located in the Gyanvapi complex of Varanasi before 1993 has become important. Allahabad High Court says that a decision will be taken once it becomes
Maharashtra Board: Class 10 annual board exam canceled, the result will come by end of June
The Maharashtra government has canceled the annual Class 10 board exams for the year 2021 on Friday, May 28, due to the rising outbreak of the Korena epidemic. Along with this, the Education
Coronavirus Vaccine: Vaccine of life, so that everyone gets protection against coronavirus
At present, there is a big relief in the country on the front of the Corona epidemic. The spread of the coronavirus is under control, deaths are decreasing and life is slowly getting back on track.
BSEH 10th Result Update: Results could not be declared till May 31, read when HBSE 10th result will come
Haryana Board 10 result 2020 update: Haryana Board 10th results could not be released till the end of May. However, Haryana Board Secretary Rajiv Prasad told the media on May 20 that the 10th result
RBI: Reserve Bank of India gave relief to banks and NBFCs regarding credit and debit cards, you should also know
The Reserve Bank of India has given relief to credit and debit card issuing banks and non-banking finance companies (NBFCs). The RBI on Tuesday extended by three months the deadline for complying with
Hockey players clashed in Commonwealth Games: Angered by a stick, one player grabbed another's throat, and pulled T-shirt; The referee kicked off the field
The men's hockey match was played between England and Canada at the Commonwealth Games on Thursday. During this, there was a fierce fight between the two players. Canada's Balraj Panesar and England's
Christopher Nolan Oppenheimer: Cillian Murphy recited Bhagavad Gita to become 'Oppenheimer', know how the actor was impressed
Hollywood film 'Oppenheimer' has been one of the most awaited films to release in the year 2023 ever since it was announced. There has been a lot of craze among the people about this film, seeing that
Cyber Security: It is necessary to study cyber security in UG-PG, to make students aware and to give technical knowledge
In the academic session 2022-23, the study of cyber security in undergraduate and postgraduate programs will be mandatory in all higher educational institutions of the country. The undergraduate
Delhi School Bomb Threat: Threatening mail sent by hiding the original IP address through VPN, same ID used
Mails giving information about bombs being planted in schools of Delhi-NCR have been sent from abroad. Russia's Virtual Private Network (VPN) has been used in this.