Gyanvapi Case: In the Gyanvapi case, today the Muslim side objected to the claims of the Hindu side, hearing was postponed till July 4

Posted on 30th May 2022 by rohit kumar

Gyanvapi Mosque Dispute: A hearing was held on Monday in the court of the District Judge of Varanasi regarding the Gyanvapi Mosque dispute. As soon as the hearing started, arguments were put on behalf of the Anjuman Inazaniya Masajid Committee. The Muslim side, in its arguments, kept saying that the whole matter should be rejected. The Muslim side lodged objections to the claim of the Hindus. The court has adjourned the hearing of the case till July 4.

 

Let us tell you, earlier on 26 May also many arguments were given on behalf of the Muslim side, in which there was talk of getting the case scrapped. During this, the Muslim side demanded the dismissal of the petition of the Hindu side and also claimed that there is a fountain of Wuzukhana, not a Shivling in the Gyanvapi complex. Apart from this, the 'Places of Worship Act' was also discussed in the court during this period.

 

Court ordered both the parties to give video and photos

 

At the same time, on Friday, May 27, the Varanasi District Court had heard on the issue of whether the survey report and videography should be made public. The opinion of both the Hindu and Muslim parties differed on this subject. The Gyanvapi Masjid Committee has requested the court not to allow the photographs and videos of the survey to be made public. On the other hand, the Hindu side opposed the argument of the Muslim side. After which the Varanasi district court had ordered that on May 30, videos and photos would be given to both the parties.

 

What is the whole matter?

 

It is worth mentioning that Delhi resident Rakhi Singh and four other women had filed a petition seeking permission for regular worship of Shringar Gauri and ordering the security of various deities located on the premises. On this, the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ravi Kumar Diwakar had issued an order on April 26 and ordered a videography survey of the Gyanvapi-Sringar Gauri complex to be submitted by May 10.

 

The court had appointed Ajay Mishra as the court commissioner for this. The survey proceedings started on 6 May, which were halted on 7 May due to the uproar. The court commissioner and the plaintiff who came to conduct the survey were opposed by the Muslim side. On May 9, the Muslim side raised questions about the impartiality of the court commissioner and demanded his removal. There was a three-day debate in the court regarding this and then on May 12, a Varanasi court had rejected the application for the removal of court commissioner Ajay Mishra. Along with this, Vishal Singh was appointed as Special Court Commissioner and Ajay Pratap Singh as Assistant Court Commissioner. The court had made it clear that videography would be done inside the Gyanvapi mosque as well. After which the survey work started in Gyanvapi Masjid.

 

Claimed to get Shivling in the survey

 

During the survey, the Hindu side claimed to have found a Shivling in the Vuzukhana. Again the matter had reached the Supreme Court. After which the Vuzukhana was sealed. While hearing this case, the Supreme Court sent it from the Sessions Court to the Varanasi District Court. Also, the court had said that the interim order of the Supreme Court will remain in force for 8 weeks. The Supreme Court issued an interim order of 8 weeks on 17 May. The Supreme Court had said in its order that where it has been said to get 'Shivling', ensure its security. Also, Muslims were allowed to offer Namaz. Since then the hearing of this case is going on in the Varanasi District Court.