The Supreme Court will hear on Thursday a batch of PILs challenging the validity of certain provisions of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, which prohibits filing a suit to reclaim a place of worship or to seek a change in its character from the form prevailing on August 15, 1947.
A special bench of CJI Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar, and Justice KV Vishwanathan may hear the matter. Several petitions are pending in the apex court, including one filed by Ashwini Upadhyay, who has prayed that sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 be struck down. The petitioner says that these three sections violate Articles 14,15, 21, 25,26, and 29 of the Indian Constitution. According to the petition, all these are against the basic spirit and preamble of our Constitution. One of the various reasons presented was the argument that these provisions take away the right of judicial remedy to reclaim the place of worship of an individual or religious group.
This law was brought by the PV Narasimha Rao government.
In 1991, the then Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao's government brought the Places of Worship Act. According to this law, a place of worship of any religion that came into existence before 15 August 1947 cannot be converted into a place of worship of another religion. If someone tries to do so, he can be imprisoned for one to three years and fined. The Ayodhya case was in court at that time, so it was kept out of this law.
Section two of this law says that if any petition or other proceedings regarding the change in the character of any religious place existing on 15 August 1947 are pending in any court, tribunal, or other authority, then it will be closed. At the same time, Section 3 of the Act prohibits the conversion of a place of worship completely or partially into a place of worship of another religion. Even Section 3 of the Act prohibits the full or partial conversion of a place of worship of any religious sect into a place of worship of a different religious sect or a different section of the same religious sect.
Section 4 (1) says that the character of a place of worship on 15 August 1947 must be maintained as it was. At the same time, Section 4 (2) talks about stopping those cases, appeals, and legal proceedings that were pending on the date of implementation of the Places of Worship Act. Along with this, this section also prohibits the filing of any new case. Section 5 of this law says that the Places of Worship Act will not apply to the cases related to Ram Janmabhoomi.
Why was this law made?
The Ram Mandir movement was at its peak in the 1990s. Due to the growing influence of the Ram Mandir movement, many temple-mosque disputes started arising along with Ayodhya. To put an end to these disputes, the then Narasimha Rao government had brought this law.
At least two petitions challenging this law are pending in the court. One of these petitions is from Vishwa Bhadra Pujari Purohit Mahasangh of Lucknow and some other people of Sanatan Dharma. The second petition has been filed by BJP leader and lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay. Both petitions are pending in the Supreme Court.
The petitioners say that this law prohibits judicial review. Which is a basic feature of the Constitution. Along with this, this law also imposes an arbitrary irrational cutoff date which reduces the rights of the followers of Hindu, Jain, Buddhist, and Sikh religions.
Is this law being opposed for the first time?
When the Central Government brought this law in July 1991, even then the BJP had opposed it in the Parliament. At that time, Arun Jaitley in Rajya Sabha and Uma Bharti in Lok Sabha had demanded that the matter be sent to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC).
After the Ayodhya verdict, once again claims are being made about 100 places of worship across the country, including Kashi and Mathura, to be temple land, but due to the 1991 law, the claimants cannot go to court. The Muslim side is saying that this law has been violated in Gyanvapi.
Earthquake: 6.8 magnitude earthquake wreaks havoc in Tibet, 32 people killed, 38 injured
Strong earthquake tremors were felt in Tibet on Tuesday. More than 32 people died in this severe earthquake. While 38 people have been injured. According to the China Earthquake Network Center (CENC),
Strong opposition from Mamata government: Sharp reaction to UGC draft rule, made these allegations against the central government
On Thursday, the last day of the first phase of the budget session in the Bengal Assembly, Education Minister Bratya Basu brought a proposal demanding the withdrawal of the draft of the University
'Change the name of Uttarakhand to Uttar Pradesh-2', Akhilesh taunts Dhami on changing the names of 15 places in Devbhoomi.
Along with removing the symbols of slavery in Devbhoomi Uttarakhand, the government is rapidly moving towards changing the British-era names of various places. In this episode, on Monday, Chief
Maharashtra government approached SC against the release of Mumbai train blast accused. Hearing will be held on July 24
The Maharashtra government has approached the Supreme Court in the case of the 2006 horrific train blasts in Mumbai. The government has challenged the decision of the Bombay High Court in the Supreme
Sardaar Ji 3: Insta accounts of many Pakistani artists, including Mawra-Saba, active amid controversy, users raised questions.
After the Pahalgam attack in April, the Instagram accounts of Pakistani artists were suspended in India. After which, these accounts stopped appearing in India. But now when there is a controversy
Raja Murder Case: The court also sent the fourth accused Anand on transit remand, now Shillong Police will take all four
Anand Kurmi, the fourth accused in the Raja Raghuvanshi murder case, was presented in court on Tuesday morning. From there, he was also sent on a seven-day transit remand. He was brought from Bina to
'My friendship with Elon Musk is old', PM Modi praised the world's richest person; What did he say on DOGE mission?
Recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi appeared on the podcast show of AI researcher Lex Fridman. This show is of three hours and during this time he shared many things. PM Modi talked about US
Republic Day 2025: Who will be the state guest on Republic Day? Who accepted PM Narendra Modi's invitation?
This time on the occasion of Republic Day, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto will be the state guest of India. The Ministry of External Affairs has said that the President of Indonesia has
IND vs AUS: Cricket experts reacted to the scuffle between Kohli and Constas, Gavaskar and Vaughan gave their opinion
On the first day of the Boxing Day match being played between India and Australia in Melbourne, a controversy erupted when Virat Kohli and debutant Australian young batsman Sam Constas got into a
Weather changes due to drizzle in Delhi-NCR, how will the weather be today in other states, including UP-Bihar?
The monsoon has begun to withdraw from North India. For the past few days, several states, including Delhi-NCR, have experienced humid heat. However, the weather may change in many places today. The
