A big decision has come in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Mosque dispute in Mathura. The Allahabad High Court today dismissed the petition of Shahi Idgah Mosque challenging the admissibility of 18 cases filed by Hindu parties. With this decision, the way has been cleared for hearing all 18 cases on their merits. A bench of Justice Mayank Kumar Jain has found all 18 cases to be admissible.
First, know what the High Court said today?
A single judge of Justice Mayank Kumar Jain had reserved his decision on June 6 after hearing the petition of the Shahi Idgah Mosque Committee. The petition questioned the admissibility of 18 cases filed by Hindu parties. On Thursday, the court gave an important verdict and rejected the argument of the Muslim side. On Thursday, the court said in an important decision that the suits of Hindu parties are not barred under the Limitation Act or Places of Worship Act, etc.
With this, the court rejected the primary argument put forward by the Managing Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah (Mathura) Committee. The committee argued that the cases pending before the High Court are barred under the Places of Worship Act 1991, Limitation Act 1963, and Specific Relief Act 1963.
What arguments did both parties put forward in the court?
The single judge had started hearing the objections of the mosque committee in February this year. Before the court, the Muslim side mainly argued that in most of the cases pending before the High Court, the plaintiffs are seeking the right to ownership of the land. This demand was the subject of an agreement between the Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sangh and the management of Shahi Masjid Idgah in 1968. The disputed land was divided in the 1968 agreement and both groups were asked to stay away from each other's areas within the 13.37-acre complex. The Muslim side, however, argued that the suits are specifically barred by several laws including the Places of Worship Act, 1991.
On the other hand, the Hindu parties argued that no property in the name of Shahi Idgah is in government records and it is illegally occupied. They also argued that if the property is a Wakf property, the Wakf Board should disclose who has donated the disputed property. They also argued that the Places of Worship Act, Limitation Act, and Wakf Act are not applicable in this case.
The original suits filed in the court sought, among other things, the removal of Shahi Idgah. Challenging the admissibility of these suits, the Muslim side argued that the plaintiff had admitted the 1968 agreement in the suit. The plaintiff has also admitted the fact that the possession of the land, where the Idgah is built, is under the control of the mosque management and hence the suit would be barred by the Limitation Act as well as the Places of Worship Act. This is because the plants also admit the fact that the mosque in question was built in 1669-70.
On the other hand, the Hindu side argued that encroaching upon any property, changing its nature, and converting it into a Waqf property without ownership is the nature of Waqf and such a practice cannot be allowed. They also argued that the provisions of the Waqf Act would not apply in this case as the disputed property is not a Waqf property. It was also argued that the provisions of the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act 1958 apply to the entire part of the disputed property. Its notification was issued on 26 February 1920 and now the provisions of Waqf will not apply to this property.
How old is the dispute?
The Shahi Idgah Mosque is adjacent to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi temple complex in Mathura city. On October 12, 1968, the Sri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan agreed with the Shahi Masjid Idgah Trust. The agreement talks about the construction of both the temple and the mosque on 13.37 acres of land.
The entire dispute is about this 13.37 acres of land. Out of this land, 10.9 acres of land is near Shri Krishna Janmasthan and 2.5 acres of land is near Shahi Idgah Mosque. In this agreement, the Muslim side left some of its possessions for the temple, and the Muslim side was given some land nearby in return. Now the Hindu side is demanding possession of the entire 13.37 acres of land.
What does history say?
It is said that Aurangzeb destroyed the ancient Keshavnath temple built on the birthplace of Shri Krishna and built the Shahi Idgah Mosque at the same place in 1669-70. In 1770, there was a war between the Mughals and the Marathas in Govardhan. The Marathas won in it. After the victory, the Marathas built the temple again. In 1935, the Allahabad High Court allotted 13.37 acres of land to Raja Krishna Das of Banaras. In 1951, Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust acquired this land.
'Now even mutton-chicken eaters have become animal lovers...', why did the government say this in the Supreme Court in the case of stray dogs?
SC on stray dogs. Today again, the Supreme Court heard the case regarding stray dogs in Delhi-NCR. Some people were seen supporting the decision of the Supreme Court to send dogs to shelter homes,
Kolkata Doctor Murder Case: Can President's rule be imposed in Bengal? Governor CV Anand Bose expressed his opinion
Bengal Governor Dr CV Anand Bose expressed concern over the incident of rape and murder of a female doctor in Kolkata's government RG Kar Hospital. On Friday, he said that whatever happened in RG Kar
'The masters of terror can hear my voice directly' PM Modi's strong message to Pakistan from Kargil War Memorial.
On the occasion of the 25th Kargil Vijay Diwas, Prime Minister Narendra Modi today paid tribute to the brave martyrs at the Kargil War Memorial. After this, PM Modi reached the War Memorial and
Bangladesh violence: Hatred is not decreasing in Bangladesh, now BNP leader burnt his wife's saree in protest against India
A controversial incident has come to light amid increasing cases of atrocities on minority Hindus in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) senior joint general secretary Ruhul Kabir Rizvi
Will 20 thousand Indians be sent back from America? Modi government is ready to help and knows who is in danger.
US President Donald Trump made several important decisions after taking the oath of office. The Trump administration is going to take strict action against illegal immigration.
Delhi Pollution: Before Diwali, breathing problem persists in the capital, AQI crosses 300; toxic foam visible in Yamuna
Delhiites are facing breathing problems. The AQI of many areas of the capital has been recorded above 300. According to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), the AQI in the national capital is
Delhi Schools Bomb Threat: Threatening mails were sent late at night, information turned out to be fake in investigation, Kejriwal said this
Once again, schools in Delhi have received bomb threats. Six private schools were threatened through e-mail on Friday. Delhi Fire Service officials and police reached the spot and investigated. The
Trudeau on backfoot over Nijjar's murder: Said- there is no solid evidence against India; India said- Canadian PM is responsible for spoiling relations
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has admitted that when he accused Indian agents of being involved in the murder of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar last year, he only had intelligence
RG Kar College: SIT will investigate the financial transactions done during the tenure of the former principal, and will submit the report in a month
Former principal Sandip Ghosh's troubles are increasing after he resigned soon after the rape and murder of a female doctor at Kolkata's RG Kar Medical College and Hospital. While on one hand, the CBI
'Proud of the way Indian parties presented India's side to the world', what else did PM Modi say about the delegation?
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday said he was proud of the way multi-party parliamentary delegations presented India's viewpoint in various countries on the need to end the threat of terrorism