A big decision has come in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Mosque dispute in Mathura. The Allahabad High Court today dismissed the petition of Shahi Idgah Mosque challenging the admissibility of 18 cases filed by Hindu parties. With this decision, the way has been cleared for hearing all 18 cases on their merits. A bench of Justice Mayank Kumar Jain has found all 18 cases to be admissible.
First, know what the High Court said today?
A single judge of Justice Mayank Kumar Jain had reserved his decision on June 6 after hearing the petition of the Shahi Idgah Mosque Committee. The petition questioned the admissibility of 18 cases filed by Hindu parties. On Thursday, the court gave an important verdict and rejected the argument of the Muslim side. On Thursday, the court said in an important decision that the suits of Hindu parties are not barred under the Limitation Act or Places of Worship Act, etc.
With this, the court rejected the primary argument put forward by the Managing Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah (Mathura) Committee. The committee argued that the cases pending before the High Court are barred under the Places of Worship Act 1991, Limitation Act 1963, and Specific Relief Act 1963.
What arguments did both parties put forward in the court?
The single judge had started hearing the objections of the mosque committee in February this year. Before the court, the Muslim side mainly argued that in most of the cases pending before the High Court, the plaintiffs are seeking the right to ownership of the land. This demand was the subject of an agreement between the Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sangh and the management of Shahi Masjid Idgah in 1968. The disputed land was divided in the 1968 agreement and both groups were asked to stay away from each other's areas within the 13.37-acre complex. The Muslim side, however, argued that the suits are specifically barred by several laws including the Places of Worship Act, 1991.
On the other hand, the Hindu parties argued that no property in the name of Shahi Idgah is in government records and it is illegally occupied. They also argued that if the property is a Wakf property, the Wakf Board should disclose who has donated the disputed property. They also argued that the Places of Worship Act, Limitation Act, and Wakf Act are not applicable in this case.
The original suits filed in the court sought, among other things, the removal of Shahi Idgah. Challenging the admissibility of these suits, the Muslim side argued that the plaintiff had admitted the 1968 agreement in the suit. The plaintiff has also admitted the fact that the possession of the land, where the Idgah is built, is under the control of the mosque management and hence the suit would be barred by the Limitation Act as well as the Places of Worship Act. This is because the plants also admit the fact that the mosque in question was built in 1669-70.
On the other hand, the Hindu side argued that encroaching upon any property, changing its nature, and converting it into a Waqf property without ownership is the nature of Waqf and such a practice cannot be allowed. They also argued that the provisions of the Waqf Act would not apply in this case as the disputed property is not a Waqf property. It was also argued that the provisions of the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act 1958 apply to the entire part of the disputed property. Its notification was issued on 26 February 1920 and now the provisions of Waqf will not apply to this property.
How old is the dispute?
The Shahi Idgah Mosque is adjacent to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi temple complex in Mathura city. On October 12, 1968, the Sri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan agreed with the Shahi Masjid Idgah Trust. The agreement talks about the construction of both the temple and the mosque on 13.37 acres of land.
The entire dispute is about this 13.37 acres of land. Out of this land, 10.9 acres of land is near Shri Krishna Janmasthan and 2.5 acres of land is near Shahi Idgah Mosque. In this agreement, the Muslim side left some of its possessions for the temple, and the Muslim side was given some land nearby in return. Now the Hindu side is demanding possession of the entire 13.37 acres of land.
What does history say?
It is said that Aurangzeb destroyed the ancient Keshavnath temple built on the birthplace of Shri Krishna and built the Shahi Idgah Mosque at the same place in 1669-70. In 1770, there was a war between the Mughals and the Marathas in Govardhan. The Marathas won in it. After the victory, the Marathas built the temple again. In 1935, the Allahabad High Court allotted 13.37 acres of land to Raja Krishna Das of Banaras. In 1951, Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust acquired this land.
PM Modi: PM Modi inaugurated the ITU Conference-Mobile Congress, more than 190 countries are participating
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday inaugurated the World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA) organized by the United Nations International Telecommunication Union (ITU) in
Sambhal Violence: The rioters will be made to pay for the losses in Sambhal violence, the administration team is assessing
Politics has intensified over the violence over the survey of Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, while on the other hand, the police administration has made it clear that the rioters will
Saif Ali Khan Attack: Came to India after infiltrating from Bangladesh, then attacked Saif; What was Mohammad Shariful's intention?
Mumbai Police caught the attacker who stabbed Bollywood star Saif Ali Khan in the early hours of Sunday. Police have arrested the accused from Thane. Police said that the accused had come to Mumbai
Pushpa 2 Trailer: Fans went out of control in Patna for a glimpse of Allu Arjun and Rashmika Mandana, police used lathi
The trailer of the South movie Pushpa 2 is to be launched today (17 November) at Gandhi Maidan in the capital Patna. Actor Allu Arjun and actress Rashmika Mandana are also to attend this event. A
Why did Vikrant Massey decide to retire from acting? Finally, the real reason has come out!
'The Sabarmati Report' actor Vikrant Massey shocked everyone by announcing his retirement from films by posting on Instagram yesterday. After this shocking news, everyone wants to know why the actor
'Aurangzeb was a good, social worker and justice-loving ruler', said CM Nitish and Owaisi's party leaders
These days, there is a lot of debate in the country about the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb. Politics has heated up in Bihar in the name of Aurangzeb. On the fourth day of the budget session in the Bihar
Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3: Before the release of the film, the director improved Tripti's image, made a big claim about the actress
Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 is all set to release in theatres this Diwali. The film stars many star actors like Kartik Aaryan, Vidya Balan, Madhuri Dixit, and Tripti Dimri in important roles. Now recently,
Raja Murder Case: The court also sent the fourth accused Anand on transit remand, now Shillong Police will take all four
Anand Kurmi, the fourth accused in the Raja Raghuvanshi murder case, was presented in court on Tuesday morning. From there, he was also sent on a seven-day transit remand. He was brought from Bina to
Constitution Day: 'Our Constitution is a living and progressive document', said the President in the joint session of Parliament
Today, on the occasion of Constitution Day, President Draupadi Murmu addressed the joint session of Parliament. This joint session was held in the Central Hall of Parliament. On Tuesday, 75 years have
The Great Indian Kapil Show: Kapil Sharma made fun of Atlee on the show, netizens got angry at the comedian
Humor and jokes are good only till someone is not hurt. Insulting someone is not a joke. What Kapil Sharma has done with director Atlee in his show recently is shameful. Comedian and actor Kapil
