A big decision has come in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Mosque dispute in Mathura. The Allahabad High Court today dismissed the petition of Shahi Idgah Mosque challenging the admissibility of 18 cases filed by Hindu parties. With this decision, the way has been cleared for hearing all 18 cases on their merits. A bench of Justice Mayank Kumar Jain has found all 18 cases to be admissible.
First, know what the High Court said today?
A single judge of Justice Mayank Kumar Jain had reserved his decision on June 6 after hearing the petition of the Shahi Idgah Mosque Committee. The petition questioned the admissibility of 18 cases filed by Hindu parties. On Thursday, the court gave an important verdict and rejected the argument of the Muslim side. On Thursday, the court said in an important decision that the suits of Hindu parties are not barred under the Limitation Act or Places of Worship Act, etc.
With this, the court rejected the primary argument put forward by the Managing Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah (Mathura) Committee. The committee argued that the cases pending before the High Court are barred under the Places of Worship Act 1991, Limitation Act 1963, and Specific Relief Act 1963.
What arguments did both parties put forward in the court?
The single judge had started hearing the objections of the mosque committee in February this year. Before the court, the Muslim side mainly argued that in most of the cases pending before the High Court, the plaintiffs are seeking the right to ownership of the land. This demand was the subject of an agreement between the Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sangh and the management of Shahi Masjid Idgah in 1968. The disputed land was divided in the 1968 agreement and both groups were asked to stay away from each other's areas within the 13.37-acre complex. The Muslim side, however, argued that the suits are specifically barred by several laws including the Places of Worship Act, 1991.
On the other hand, the Hindu parties argued that no property in the name of Shahi Idgah is in government records and it is illegally occupied. They also argued that if the property is a Wakf property, the Wakf Board should disclose who has donated the disputed property. They also argued that the Places of Worship Act, Limitation Act, and Wakf Act are not applicable in this case.
The original suits filed in the court sought, among other things, the removal of Shahi Idgah. Challenging the admissibility of these suits, the Muslim side argued that the plaintiff had admitted the 1968 agreement in the suit. The plaintiff has also admitted the fact that the possession of the land, where the Idgah is built, is under the control of the mosque management and hence the suit would be barred by the Limitation Act as well as the Places of Worship Act. This is because the plants also admit the fact that the mosque in question was built in 1669-70.
On the other hand, the Hindu side argued that encroaching upon any property, changing its nature, and converting it into a Waqf property without ownership is the nature of Waqf and such a practice cannot be allowed. They also argued that the provisions of the Waqf Act would not apply in this case as the disputed property is not a Waqf property. It was also argued that the provisions of the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act 1958 apply to the entire part of the disputed property. Its notification was issued on 26 February 1920 and now the provisions of Waqf will not apply to this property.
How old is the dispute?
The Shahi Idgah Mosque is adjacent to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi temple complex in Mathura city. On October 12, 1968, the Sri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan agreed with the Shahi Masjid Idgah Trust. The agreement talks about the construction of both the temple and the mosque on 13.37 acres of land.
The entire dispute is about this 13.37 acres of land. Out of this land, 10.9 acres of land is near Shri Krishna Janmasthan and 2.5 acres of land is near Shahi Idgah Mosque. In this agreement, the Muslim side left some of its possessions for the temple, and the Muslim side was given some land nearby in return. Now the Hindu side is demanding possession of the entire 13.37 acres of land.
What does history say?
It is said that Aurangzeb destroyed the ancient Keshavnath temple built on the birthplace of Shri Krishna and built the Shahi Idgah Mosque at the same place in 1669-70. In 1770, there was a war between the Mughals and the Marathas in Govardhan. The Marathas won in it. After the victory, the Marathas built the temple again. In 1935, the Allahabad High Court allotted 13.37 acres of land to Raja Krishna Das of Banaras. In 1951, Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust acquired this land.
PM Modi watched Vikrant Massey's The Sabarmati Report, a film based on the Godhra incident.
PM Narendra Modi has seen Ekta Kapoor's film 'The Sabarmati Report' based on the Godhra incident. Actor Vikrant Massey has played the lead role in the film. Vikrant has recently posted a post on
PM Modi: PM Modi will visit Gujarat on the 26th; and will unveil the country's first 9000 horsepower electric locomotive engine
Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit Gujarat on a two-day visit on May 26. During this, he will unveil the country's first 9,000 horsepower locomotive engine. He will also participate in a roadshow
Rohit Sharma: Not Virat-Bumrah, Indian captain Rohit Sharma gave credit to these three people for winning the T20 World Cup
Indian team captain Rohit Sharma said on Wednesday that former head coach Rahul Dravid, selection committee chairman Ajit Agarkar, and Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) secretary Jay Shah
Turkiye trapped for helping Pakistan, RSS's affiliate organization demands ban; Appeal for boycott
During the conflict between India and Pakistan, the Turkish government openly supported Pakistan. There is resentment in India over this. Opposition to Turkey has started in India. Swadeshi Jagran
There may be changes in the Congress organization! In the CWC meeting, Rahul Gandhi said- Kharge ji, use the whip.
After the setbacks in the assembly elections, the Congress Working Committee convened brainstormed on the organization, and also raised questions on the role of the Election Commission. The party
Kolkata Rape Case: 'Kolkata law student was given an inhaler so that she could be raped'; lawyer told the court
On the night of the incident, when the Kolkata rape victim had a panic attack and pleaded to be taken to a hospital, the accused treated her worse than demons. They gave her an inhaler not out of
India-Pakistan Conflict: So was China behind the India-Pakistan tension? Jaishankar gave a shocking statement
After the Pahalgam attack, India took its revenge on Pakistan by running Operation Sindoor. After Operation Sindoor, Pakistan suffered a defeat in the conflict situation. Pakistan has suffered a huge
Bangladeshi protesters do not value independence! Statues related to Pakistan's surrender were vandalized; Tharoor said - they were not worthy of forgiveness
Even after the political upheaval and coup in Bangladesh, violent protests in the country have not calmed down. Various pictures of violence are coming from different parts of the country.
Delhi Election 2025: Kejriwal put an end to speculations of AAP-Congress alliance, said- will fight elections alone
Arvind Kejriwal has put an end to the news of the alliance between the Aam Aadmi Party and Congress in the Delhi Assembly elections. Kejriwal said that Aam Aadmi Party will contest the elections in
Israel Iran Row: Iran retaliates after Israel attacks nuclear plants, Khamenei says will give severe punishment.
Iran has retaliated after Israel attacked nuclear plants. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that Israel will have to face severe punishment for attacking our country. Khamenei said