New Delhi, Feb 5 (IANS) The Supreme Court Thursday ruled that suppression or non-disclosure of information about serious crimes by a candidate at the time of filing nomination interferes with the voters' right to make an informed choice and the election of such a candidate is liable to be set aside.
When there is non-disclosure of the offences pertaining to heinous or serious offence or offences relating to corruption or moral turpitude at the time of filing of nomination paper, it creates an impediment in the free exercise of electoral right by a voter, said a bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Prafulla C. Pant.
"As a candidate has the special knowledge of the pending cases against him where cognizance has been taken or charges have been framed and there is non-disclosure on his part, it would amount to undue influence. Therefore, election is to be declared null and void by the Election Tribunal under Section 100(1)(b) of the 1951 Act," the court said.
"Concealment or suppression of this nature deprives the voters to make an informed and advised choice as a consequence of which it would come within the compartment of direct or indirect interference or attempt to interfere with the free exercise of the right to vote by the electorate, on the part of the candidate," Justice Misra said pronouncing the judgment.
Making it clear that disclosure of criminal antecedents by a candidate was a statutory obligation, the court said: "Disclosure of criminal antecedents of a candidate, especially, pertaining to heinous or serious offence or offences relating to corruption or moral turpitude at the time of filing of nomination paper as mandated by law is a categorical imperative."
"The question whether it materially affects the election or not would not arise in a case of this nature," said the court as it dismissed an appeal by Krishnamurthy who was elected as the president of Thekampatti panchayat in Mettupalayam taluka of Tamil Nadu's Coimbatore Oct 13, 2006. Krishnamurthy involved in eight cases relating to embezzlement.
The validity of Krishnamurthy's election was challenged on the ground that he had filed a false declaration suppressing the details of criminal cases pending trial against him and, therefore, his nomination deserved to be rejected by the returning officer.
The Election Tribunal after examining all the material set aside his election holding that Krishnamurthy's nomination papers should have been rejected and he could not have contested. It also ordered re-election for the post of the president of Thekampatti panchayat.
Hearing Krishnamurthy's appeal, the Madras High Court agreed with the ultimate conclusion of the tribunal but for a different reason.
The apex court, while dismissing the appeal by Krishnamurthy, said: "Ex consequenti, the appeal, being sans substance, stands dismissed with costs, which is assessed at Rs.50,000."
The Election Commission will announce the dates of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections at 3 pm today. Vo
NEET UG 2022: National Testing Agency (NTA) may release the official notification of the National
Justice DY Chandrachud will be the 50th CJI of the country. CJI UU Lalit has recommended his name
The United States on Thursday declared monkeypox a public health emergency. According to US Healt
Tourism Ministry gets 33 Percent hike in Budget
New Delhi, Feb 28 (IANS) An amount of Rs.1,573.07 crore has been earmarked for the tourism mini
Agra gears up for Taj Mahotsav
Agra, Feb 17 (IANS) Undeterred by the swine flue scare, people in Agra are in full celebratory
US President Joe Biden on Wednesday praised the vote against Russia and the resolution passed in
The Delhi Police has made a big disclosure about the violent demonstration on the Red Fort during
Monsoon rains are being seen in many states of the country. According to the forecast of the Mete
107 days later active patients figure less than 5 lakhs; 12 crore people test completed
There is good news about Corona. After 107 days or about 4 months, the number of active corona pa
