New Delhi, Jan 17 (IANS) The Supreme Court has held that while sentencing an accused, the courts should not only strike a balance between needs of the society and fairness to the accused but also award just compensation to the victim of crime.
"The court has to give attention not only to the nature of crime, prescribed sentence, mitigating and aggravating circumstances to strike just balance in needs of society and fairness to the accused, but also to keep in mind the need to give justice to the victim of crime," said a bench of Justice T.S.Thakur and Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel in their judgment Friday.
The court said that the "order of sentence in a criminal case needs due application of mind" and the "just compensation to the victim has to be fixed having regard to the medical and other expenses, pain and suffering, loss of earning and other relevant factors".
Pointing out that justice to the victim often gets overlooked, Justice Goel, speaking for the bench, said: "In spite of legislative changes and decisions of this court, this aspect at times escapes attention."
"Rehabilitating the victim is as important as punishing the accused. Victim's plight cannot be ignored even when a crime goes unpunished for want of adequate evidence," he said.
"While punishment to the accused is one aspect, determination of just compensation to the victim is the other. At times, evidence is not available in this regard. Some guess work in such a situation is inevitable," the judgment said.
The court said that the compensation was payable under Section 357 and 357-A of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
While under section 357, financial capacity of the accused has to be kept in mind, section 357-A under which compensation comes out of state funds, has to be invoked to make up the requirement of just compensation, said the court, while upholding an appeal by Manohar Singh against the Rajasthan High Court's Nov 23, 2011 verdict acquitting 10 accused given varying period of sentences by the trial court for assaulting four people Oct 29, 1980 over a land dispute.
The court said it may not be appropriate to award any sentence of imprisonment to any accused and at best compensation may be directed to be paid by the accused or the state to the appellant.
"In the present case, in the absence of any evidence about the medical expenses, loss of earning etc. and the financial capacity of the accused, we are of the view that the appellant (Mahohar Singh) needs to be paid a sum of Rs.50,000 as compensation under section 357(3) within two months by the surviving respondents (assailant accused)."
For the last four days, there has been a huge uproar in many parts of the country over the Agneep
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has made a big statement on the division of powers. He said that
PM Modi: Prime Minister Modi will visit Sikkim, will participate in the golden jubilee celebrations
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is coming to Sikkim on 29 May. He will participate in the program or
Cyber Security Course: UGC Directives - Start Cyber Security Courses in Universities, Colleges
Cybercrime is spreading day by day in our society. Every day there are cases of cyber fraud by so
AAP ahead of BJP, Congress in Delhi
New Delhi, Feb 10 (IANS) The AAP led in five seats and the BJP and the Congress in one seat eac
Russian President Vladimir Putin recently said that any countries opposing Russia during the war
Sambhal DM Dr. Rajendra Pensia went to meet Sant Premanand Maharaj at his Shriradha Keli Kunj in
Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Baba Siddiqui was shot dead in Mumbai on Saturday night.
Eknath Shinde News: Shiv Sena has issued a whip to the MLAs amid the crisis over the government a
HC notice to Kejriwal on Walia's plea questioning candidature
New Delhi, Feb 2 (IANS) The Delhi High Court Monday issued notice to AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal
