New Delhi, March 24 (IANS) The Supreme Court, which on Tuesday struck down Section 66 A of the Information Technology Act, said expressions such as "grossly offensive" or "menacing" in it were vague and nebulous in meaning, and there were no manageable standards by which a person can be held to have committed an offence.
"Quite apart from this, as has been pointed out above, every expression used is nebulous in meaning. What may be offensive to one may not be offensive to another. What may cause annoyance or inconvenience to one may not cause annoyance or inconvenience to another," said a bench of Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman in their judgment.
The court said that use of word "persistently" for repeated sending of message is "completely imprecise", and wondered what would constitute "persistently" - sending a message three times or eight times before it could be described as persistent.
"There is no demarcating line conveyed by any of these expressions - and that is what renders the section unconstitutionally vague," the verdict said.
Not accepting the government's contention that expressions used in the section could be incapable of any precise definition but not constitutionally vulnerable due to this, the court noted the two opposing conclusions that could be reached in dealing with vague and nebulous expressions, citing two British judgments where on the same facts, judges arrived at opposite decisions.
"If judicially trained minds can come to diametrically opposite conclusions on the same set of facts, it is obvious that expressions such as 'grossly offensive' or 'menacing' are so vague that there is no manageable standard by which a person can be said to have committed an offence or not to have committed an offence," it held, terming the expressions used in Section 66A "completely open-ended and undefined".
None of the expressions used in Section 66A - not even "criminal intimidation" with the act's definition clause - not saying that the words and expressions defined in the Indian Penal Code will apply here.
Thus, "authorities who are to enforce Section 66A have absolutely no manageable standard by which to book a person for an offence under Section 66A".
"This being the case, having regard also to the two English precedents, it is clear that Section 66A is unconstitutionally vague," the verdict said.
Due to the continuous defeat in the elections, questions have been raised on the leadership of th
SCO Interior Ministers Meet: India demands strict action against terrorism in SCO meeting
Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai called for strong action against terrorism and drug traf
Rahul Gandhi's Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra has reached Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. Today is the second da
Jamia Millia Islamia Admission: Date to fill admission form in Jamia Millia Islamia extended
JMIU Admission 2020: Jamia Millia Islamia has extended the last date of online admission form to
The corona speed in the country is increasing at a record pace. More than 2 lakh 50 thousand case
Lockdown will not be imposed in 5 cities of Uttar Pradesh including Lucknow. The Supreme Court ha
BJP organization took the feedback of Yogi government's work, know what happened in a closed room
On Tuesday, the political stir at the BJP party office in UP intensified. Before the assembly ele
Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah: Whenever it comes to TV's famous comedy shows, the audience like
India has the potential to become a world leader in footwear, and leather: Piyush Goyal
Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said on Tuesday that India has the potential to
In the US, the FDA is ready to announce the use of Remedicivir drug results positive
Washington. In the US, there have been many positive results of anti-viral drug Remadecivir for t
