
New Delhi, Feb 9 (IANS) The Delhi High Court has sought to know from the central and city government why it cannot provide publications on homoeopathy free of cost in jail to a prime accused in 2006 Mumbai serial train blasts.
Justice Rajeev Shakdher asked both governments to inform about the problem in providing the free publications to the accused for study.
The court also asked the government to inform it about the status of case of Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui, lodged in a Mumbai jail.
Siddiqui had written a letter to Delhi High Court, which was converted into a PIL, seeking a direction that he be provided 45 publications on homoeopathy free of cost in jail for studying as he was too poor to afford them.
Hearing the plea, the court suggested advocate Rajdeepa Behura, who appeared for the Delhi government, that jail authorities can purchase the publications and put them in jail liberary from where the accused can study.
"What's the problem in providing the books to accused? Jail must be having a library.. it can purchase the books and put there in library. Take instruction on the issue and also on the status of case in which accused is lodged in the jail," asked Justice Shakdher.
One of the prime accused in the Mumbai train blasts attacks of 2006, in which seven bombs kept in first-class coaches of Mumbai's suburban trains and at railway stations had killed 187, Siddiqui has been lodged in jail since 2006.
Siddiqui had sought copies of books published by the Central Council for Research in Homeopathy (CCRH), Delhi under the RTI act to study but the council refused on the ground that these were "priced publications" and hence could not be given free. His request for soft copies was also turned down, citing copyright laws.
After his pleas to the CCRH and the Central Information Commission were turned down, Siddiqui drafted a letter and mailed it to the Delhi High Court in April 2012.
Siddiqui argued that since he fell in the below poverty line category, a fact verified by the Bombay High Court registrar, he should be given this "information" free of cost.
He cited Section 7(5) of the RTI Act that said that even for supplying a priced publication, no fee shall be charged from people in the poor category.
Siddiqui also raised questions over invoking of copyright laws, pointing out that providing soft copies does not violate the same unless the copies are published by anyone for financial gains without their permission.
In IPL 2023, the doubleheader match will be played on Saturday i.e. 15th April. The 16th match of
Bihar's young leader and former minister, Nitin Navin, has filed his nomination for the post of B
Corona virus: Trump introduced lockdown removal plan
US President Donald Trump has proposed a three-phase plan to start normal life in the country.
The Justice RM Lodha Committee has so far raised Rs 878.20 crore by selling the immovable propert
Former Congress President Rahul Gandhi has resigned from Amethi. Now he will contest el
Defense Minister Rajnath Singh participated in the 'Shaurya Sandhya' program on Sunday. The event
Army has killed 33 Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) terrorists who captured the Counter Terrorism Center (
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, addressing a rally in Hooghly district of West Bengal today, has ta
Today, the Muslim side can file a petition in the Allahabad High Court in the matter related to t
Children Corona Vaccine: Children may start getting corona vaccine by November-December
Covid-19 Vaccine For Children: When will the corona vaccine be administered to children, this que