New Delhi, Feb 9 (IANS) The Delhi High Court has sought to know from the central and city government why it cannot provide publications on homoeopathy free of cost in jail to a prime accused in 2006 Mumbai serial train blasts.
Justice Rajeev Shakdher asked both governments to inform about the problem in providing the free publications to the accused for study.
The court also asked the government to inform it about the status of case of Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui, lodged in a Mumbai jail.
Siddiqui had written a letter to Delhi High Court, which was converted into a PIL, seeking a direction that he be provided 45 publications on homoeopathy free of cost in jail for studying as he was too poor to afford them.
Hearing the plea, the court suggested advocate Rajdeepa Behura, who appeared for the Delhi government, that jail authorities can purchase the publications and put them in jail liberary from where the accused can study.
"What's the problem in providing the books to accused? Jail must be having a library.. it can purchase the books and put there in library. Take instruction on the issue and also on the status of case in which accused is lodged in the jail," asked Justice Shakdher.
One of the prime accused in the Mumbai train blasts attacks of 2006, in which seven bombs kept in first-class coaches of Mumbai's suburban trains and at railway stations had killed 187, Siddiqui has been lodged in jail since 2006.
Siddiqui had sought copies of books published by the Central Council for Research in Homeopathy (CCRH), Delhi under the RTI act to study but the council refused on the ground that these were "priced publications" and hence could not be given free. His request for soft copies was also turned down, citing copyright laws.
After his pleas to the CCRH and the Central Information Commission were turned down, Siddiqui drafted a letter and mailed it to the Delhi High Court in April 2012.
Siddiqui argued that since he fell in the below poverty line category, a fact verified by the Bombay High Court registrar, he should be given this "information" free of cost.
He cited Section 7(5) of the RTI Act that said that even for supplying a priced publication, no fee shall be charged from people in the poor category.
Siddiqui also raised questions over invoking of copyright laws, pointing out that providing soft copies does not violate the same unless the copies are published by anyone for financial gains without their permission.
Many western countries, including America, may be seen challenging Putin's army regarding the Rus
IMF approves debt relief for 25 poor countries to help them fight coronavirus
अंतर्राष्ट्रीय मुद्रा कोष ने सोमवार
Shubman Gill's rip at number three flopped even after advice from Rahul Dravid and veteran cricketer
Shubman Gill Flop Show Ind vs WI 1st Test Cheteshwar Pujara considered the wall of the Indian Tes
The hijab controversy in Karnataka is not taking its name to stop. Now a new case has come to the
Manish Sisodia has raised the question of Prime Minister Narendra Modi being educated by writing
Indian Space Research Institute (ISRO) is going to launch Chandrayaan-3 soon. A team of ISRO scie
The 16th installment of PM Kisan Samman Nidhi will come into the bank accounts of farmers today.
The problems of Himachal Pradesh are not taking the name of lessening. The Meteorological Departm
Air India: CCO of Airbus made a big statement on Tata and Air India, silent on A-350 aircraft deal
Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the International Air Transport Association's (IATA) an
Even before Kejriwal takes oath, bribe taking wanes
New Delhi, Feb 13 (IANS) Just hours after the AAP swept t
