Prevent illegal Sale of Government Land: Court


Posted on 13th Jan 2015 05:17 pm by mohit kumar

New Delhi, Jan 12 (IANS) A court here Monday directed the Delhi Police commissioner and the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to investigate and prevent illegal sale of government land by private individuals.

Additional Sessions Judge Sanjeev Jain issued the direction while dismissing the plea of a south Delhi resident, Jai Singh, who challenged a magisterial order July 6, 2014 discharging five man -- Raghubir Singh, Ranbir Singh Lakh Ram, Girdhari Singh and Umed Singh -- accused in a fraudulent land deal case.

"...I may observe that from the record prima facie, parties in collusion with each other entered into the sale agreement of land which was already acquired by the government," the judge said observing that during course of arguments, it was alleged on behalf of the accused that complainant (Jai) had already sold some portion of land to different sellers.

The court said: "At the first look it appears that probably all the parties i.e seller and purchaser intentionally and knowingly entered into sale agreement to defeat the purpose of land acquisition, to perpetuate the unauthorized encroachment and to cheat other innocent purchaser."

The court further added that it is a matter of detailed investigation by the authorities concerned.

"In order to protect the interest of bona fide owner i.e DDA/government and to prevent any illegal transaction by anyone in respect of land in question, let copy of order be sent to commissioner of police, Delhi, as well as to vice president, DDA, for information, record and necessary action (if any)," the court said.

According to Jai Singh, he purchased land measuring 97 bighas 15 biswas in village Rajpur Khurd in south Delhi from five accused.

Jai Singh has alleged that accused cheated him by misrepresenting the fact that the order of land acquisition had been quashed by the court and sold him a government property. He told court that he was induced to pay amount of Rs.56 lakhs.

The sessions court upheld the magisterial court order and said: "I have no doubt that complainant (Jai) was well aware about the acquisition of land but still he entered in a deal to purchase land from the accused persons which was not owned by them at the time of transaction."

The court added that Jai Singh cannot take benefit of his own wrong and his plea of mis-representation or inducement appears to be false and after thought.

0 Like 0 Dislike
Previous news Next news
Other news

GST: Rs 1,48,995 crore GST collection in July, 28% increase over last year

GST collection of Rs 1,48,995 crore has been done in July. This amount is 28 percent more than th

Sunanda Pushkar's son joins probe in murder case

New Delhi, Feb 5 (IANS) Sunanda Pushkar's son Shiv Menon Thursday joined the probe in connection

PM Modi US Visit: Prime Minister Modi may visit America in February; Trump announces after talking on the phone

Prime Minister Narendra Modi may visit America in February. This came to light after talking to t

MP governor being booked for Vyapam scam: Police

Bhopal, Feb 24 (IANS) The process to book Madhya Pradesh Governor Ram Naresh Yadav for irregula

Modi 'eagerly awaiting' Seychelles, Mauritius, Sri Lanka visit

New Delhi, March 8 (IANS) Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday said he was looking forward to

New revelation in Puneet case: Manika's post on Insta is in discussion, 'After toxic environment and abuse'...

A sensational case similar to that of Atul Subhash of Bangalore has come to light in Delhi. Woodb

Dip in Defence Imports will be Economically Fruitful: Modi

Bengaluru, Feb 18 (IANS) Prime Minister Narendra Modi Wednesday said reducing imports of defence

EOU will take Manish Kashyap on remand for 7 days, police of two states ready with a list of questions

Bihar Police will take Manish Kashyap on remand, arrested for circulating a fake video of the att

Parrikar being probed in cheating case: Goa Police to court

Panaji, March 2 (IANS) Goa Police has told a court that it was conducting a "preliminary inquir

Now the validity of your monthly prepaid plan will be 30 days, not 28, TRAI gave these instructions

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India has taken an important decision for prepaid mobile cust

Sign up to write
Sign up now if you have flare of writing..
Login   |   Register
Follow Us
Indyaspeak @ Facebook Indyaspeak @ Twitter Indyaspeak @ Pinterest RSS



Play Free Quiz and Win Cash