
New Delhi, Feb 23 (IANS) The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance was brought in by the NDA government on Dec 30, 2014.
The ordinance amends the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
The act outlined the process to be followed when land is acquired for a public purpose.
Here are some of the changes to the Act which have elicited objections from activists and opposition parties:
* Exemption of five categories of land use from certain provisions: The ordinance creates five special categories of land use - defence, rural infrastructure, affordable housing, industrial corridors and infrastructure projects including public private partnership (PPP) projects where the central government owns the land.
The Act required that the consent of 80 percent of land owners is obtained for private projects and 70 percent for PPP projects.
The ordinance exempts the five categories mentioned above from this provision of the Act.
In addition, the ordinance permits the government to exempt projects in these five categories from following some provisions, through a notification.
* Return of unutilised land: The 2013 Act required that if land acquired under it remained unutilised for five years, it was returned to the original owners or the land bank.
The ordinance states that the period after which unutilised land will need to be returned will be five years, or any period specified at the time of setting up the project, whichever is later.
* Other changes: The 2013 Act excluded the acquisition of land for private hospitals and private educational institutions from its purview. The ordinance removes this restriction.
* While the 2013 Act was applicable for the acquisition of land for private companies, the ordinance changes this to acquisition for 'private entities'.
A private entity is an entity other than a government entity, and could include a proprietorship, partnership, company, corporation, non-profit organisation, or other entity under any other law.
* The 2013 Act stated that if an offence is committed by the government, the head of the department would be deemed guilty unless he could show that the offence was committed without his knowledge, or that he had exercised due diligence to prevent the commission of the offence.
The ordinance replaces this provision and states that if an offence is committed by a government official, he cannot be prosecuted without the prior sanction of the government.
In the African country of Congo, which is battling the Ebola virus, a new disaster has arisen due
The film 'The Kashmir Files', based on the massacre of Kashmiri Pandits that happened 32 years ag
Gaurav Khanna is one of the strongest contestants on Bigg Boss Season 19. He outperformed everyon
China Flood: Outcry due to heavy rains in China, record of 140 years was broken; 21 people died
Rain in China has broken the record of 140 years. In the last five days, 744.8 mm or 29.3 inches
Russia Boycott at Ukraine: Attempts are being made to isolate Russia, which has launched a horrif
Take Jaitapur project to Gujarat, says Uddhav
Mumbai, March 9 (IANS) The Shiv Sena on Monday toughened its stance vis-a-vis the BJP on the up
The second phase of the Navy's most famous Malabar exercise in the Bay of Bengal began today. Thi
The third and deciding match of the India-Sri Lanka T20 series will be played at the Saurashtra C
In Maharashtra, the battle for political possession has also started on Dahi Handi, which is held
Gagandeep Kang, one of India's top virologists, said on Thursday that from what we know about the