
New Delhi, March 1 (IANS) A court here has issued summons to former Rajya Sabha member Brajesh Pathak in connection with a leave travel concession (LTC) case.
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Special Judge Anju Bajaj Chandna issued summons to Pathak to appear before the court on March 24.
Delhi-based firm Vandna Travels Private Limited and its director Rajesh Agnihotri have also been summoned.
The court order came while taking cognizance of the CBI chargesheet filed against the company and its director on January 2.
However, the investigating agency did not chargesheet Pathak, saying there was no evidence against him.
But the judge rejected the agency's submission and said: "It is the duty of the investigating officer to forward the final report to the court and no discretion or prerogative lies with the investigative officer to evaluate the defence pleas or to assess the evidence collected on record to appreciate the defence pleas.
"The concept and scheme of Section 13 (1) (d) (criminal misconduct by a public servant for obtaining peculinary gain) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is clear and all the ingredients of the offence are complete in the present case," the court said in its February 20 order.
"Therefore, I hold that investigating officer has no basis to file closure with respect to the offences of Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and read with Section 120 B (criminal conspiracy), 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating) and 471 (using as genuine a forged document) of the Indian Penal Code concerning Brajesh Pathak," the court said.
The court observed that Pathak, being a public servant, was under bound duty to furnish the correct and genuine claim with respect to the journeys undertaken by him and the amounts spent by him.
It noted that Pathak countersigned the forged e-tickets to gain pecuniary advantage and the offence was complete when the reimbursement was credited to his account.
The allegations were that during the period 2011-2013, Pathak entered into criminal conspiracy with private people and wrongly claimed inflated reimbursement for eight companion tickets from the pay and accounts office at the Rajya Sabha Secretariat to the tune of Rs.2,19,887.
The actual payment made against the said eight companion tickets was Rs.10,499, and accordingly the excess amount to the tune of Rs.2,09,338 was claimed from the government, it added.
Pathak's tenure as Rajya Sabha member ended on November 25, 2014.
Recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has launched Jan Samarth, a credit-linked portal linked to
ICC Women's World Cup 2022 Points Table: In the ICC Women's World Cup 2022, Pakistan (PAK w vs BA
TN SSLC Result 2024: Tamil Nadu SSLC Board Exam result released, how to check result, read here
Tamil Nadu Board has declared the results of the SSLC exam. Students who participated in the exam
Vivo Y16 4G made a bang entry, great design and great features will blow your senses
Vivo Y16 4G Launch: Vivo has launched its latest budget smartphone Vivo Y16 4G in the Indian mark
Festival sales increase due to the demand for expensive appliances
Samsung's senior vice president Mohandeep Singh is well aware of how crowded the customers are on
Corona In India : Nearly 11,000 new cases of corona in India in 24 hours, active cases cross 53,000
The number of coronaviruses infected continues to increase in India. In the last 24 hours, 10 tho
India should accept five conditions on Kashmir: Geelani
New Delhi, March 23 (IANS) Hardline Hurriyat Conference leader Syed Ali Geelani on Monday said
Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia, who is in trouble in the matter of excise policy, has moved the S
Coal News : Chairman of Coal India said - will provide its share of coal to the power sector
Coal India Chairman Pramod Agarwal has assured the country's power sector about the supply of coa
What did Kunal Kamra say to Shinde that created a ruckus; now the police have filed a case.
Maharashtra politics has become bitter over the comments of comedian Kunal Kamra. Many Shiv Sena