
New Delhi, Feb 24 (IANS) The Rajya Sabha Tuesday witnessed a ruckus over the land acquisition ordinance as opposition members demanded a discussion on the bill, leading to the suspension of the business of the house.
Heated arguments were witnessed between the ruling and opposition benches as the opposition alleged that the government was trying to bypass parliament while the government denied it.
"We have given a notice. The whole country is agitated against the ordinance, there are protests going on in Delhi," Samajwadi Party leader Naresh Agarwal said.
Deputy chairman of Rajya Sabha P.J. Kurien urged the members to discuss the matter when the bill on the ordinance comes to the house. "Ordinance has to be replaced by bill. When bill comes you can discuss."
Congress deputy leader in the Rajya Sabha Anand Sharma slammed the government for trying to bypass parliament through an ordinance.
"We have given a notice under rule 267. The matter is serious enough to require suspension of business. The law passed by both houses of parliament was changed against the farmers," he said.
"We can't accept that the government will govern through ordinances overriding legislative scrutiny of parliament."
Leader of the House and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, however, said it was unfair to say the government was bypassing parliament.
"No law can bypass the house. My friend should remember 636 ordinances have come and 80 percent of them came when Anand Sharma's party was in government," Jaitley said.
"There were 70 ordinances passed by the government of first prime minister of India (Jawaharlal Nehru). When my communist friends had the United Front government, in 18 months 77 ordinances came... So saying that we bypassed parliament is not fair," the minister reminded the Rajya Sabha.
"In the last government, medical council ordinance was re-promulgated four times. representation of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes ordinance was re-promulgated three times," he said.
"This bill is listed in Lok Sabha today. Depending if it is passed, every argument can be raised when it comes to this house. But you cannot prevent Lok Sabha from discussing it," Jaitley added.
Congress leader Anand Sharma, however, argued that the ordinances brought by the UPA government were "people-friendly".
"We had to bring ordinances because your party did not allow the house to function," Sharma said alluding to the Bharatiya Janata Party.
"We had to bring ordinance on right to food bill... Which of your ordinances are people friendly?" he questioned.
As Kurien appeared ready to let the members speak on the issue, Jaitley maintained that the discussion should be held only when the land acquisition bill comes to the house.
"This bill is coming to the house or not is only anticipation. Leader of the house said it is in the other house, it maybe but the chair of this house does not know what is going to happen. Therefore there is no harm in having this discussion," Kurien said.
"I am giving only time of zero hour," he added.
Members were then allowed to speak on the issue.
The 15th season of the Indian Premier League (IPL) is to start on March 26. The first match is to
New Delhi, Feb 25 (IANS) Shopping for non-casual wear can be a task in itself as you are unable
President Greets Kuwait on National Day
New Delhi, Feb 24 (IANS) President Pranab Mukherjee Tuesday extended greetings and felicitation
Concerns about the quality of drinking water in the country are constantly increasing. Following
Hijab Controversy: Schools and colleges in Karnataka have reopened on Monday, February 28, 2022.
Big action by CM Yogi on Kanpur abduction case, 4 policemen suspended including additional SP
Kanpur: Kanpur district of Uttar Pradesh has been in the limelight for the last month. The Bikaru
Now only one day is left for the nomination of Congress President. The suspense about the preside
Social media was filled with memes after Suryakumar Yadav and Rinku Singh became heroes with the
Recently, a piece of bad news had come to the fore about the superstar Madonna, who made people d
It is said that in politics, what is shown does not happen and what happens is not visible. Big l