What if Pakistan hands a nuke to Mullah Omar or Haqqani? (Book Excerpt)


Posted on 3rd Jan 2015 03:35 pm by ram kishor

Why does US President Barack Obama lose sleep over Pakistan? Is it because of the possibility that one day some angry general may not give in to the temptation of knocking more than a few heads and decide to hand over one or more of the bombs to a Mullah Omar or a Haqqani, asks veteran diplomat Rajiv Dogra in his new book: "Where Borders Bleed: An Insider's Account of Indo-Pakistan Relations (Rupa/296 pp/Rs.360)
Excerpts:

Actor George Clooney recalls in an interview in the December 2012 issue of Esquire magazine: I talked with the President (Obama) at one of those fundraisers some months back, and I asked him, 'What keeps you up at night?'

And he said, 'Everything. Everything that gets to my desk is a critical mass. If it gets to my desk, then no one else could have handled it.'

So I said, 'So what's the one that keeps you up at night?'

He goes, 'There are quite a few.'

So I go, 'What's the one? Period.'

And he says, 'Pakistan.'

Do Indian leaders lose any sleep because of Pakistan? There is nothing in the public domain to suggest that they do. However, one thing is certain, and it is this that Indian leaders lose no opportunity in convincing the world at large that they have no ill-will towards Pakistan, and that a prosperous and stable Pakistan is in India's interest. They also go on to say that they would do all they can to help promote stability in Pakistan.

How exactly will they help, and what form India's help would assume, is never clarified. Nor is the fact taken into consideration that help by India would be seen as the kiss of death for anyone in Pakistan who receives or agrees to receive such assistance, be it a political party or an individual.

On the other hand, if the desire is to shore up Pakistan economically by cash transfers, it will be well worth recalling the US experience. Its billions have disappeared without trace, and without any stabilizing effect, in a bottomless pit called Pakistan.

Therefore critics of a realistic persuasion have often asked, 'Is Pakistan an Indian responsibility? Or is it a dangerous distraction?'

Political scientist and economist Francis Fukuyama wrote in his book State Building, 'Weak and failing states have become the single most important problem for international order.' Fukuyama may or may not have had Pakistan in view as the perfect model for his conclusion, but the vast body of international writing on Pakistan has consistently maintained that Pakistan is weak as a society and failing as a state.

There is no indication so far that Pakistan would, at any identifiable future date, be able to put in place a system that delivers efficiently and reasonably transparently. Nor is there any sign that the massive effort required to industrialize the country is about to begin in the immediate future. Without the necessary wherewithal of job creation, the large numbers of unemployed youth will take the only option available to them. And that is the path of terror. There is no antidote that India can provide to prevent that from happening.

In fact India's equanimity in the face of a very grim situation surprises observers.

The US worries endlessly about a nuclear bomb that Iran is nowhere close to possessing. It fought two wars with Iraq on the suspicion that there were weapons of mass destruction in its basement. The US' treatment of Libya bordered on impetuous brutality despite the fact that it had already forced Muammar Gaddafi to dismantle the nuclear process that was still in a nascent stage. And the US keeps worrying about the trigger-happy Pakistani generals and their arsenal of hundred-plus nuclear bombs. But the US sits thousands of kilometres away, well out of the reach of Pakistan's nuclear delivery systems.

So, is Obama right to have sleepless nights over Pakistan? Given all the information at his disposal, he may have many reasons to be worried. A principal one could be the unpredictability of the Pakistani generals. No one is denying the fact that they are solid, professional army men. But if they can commit atrocities of the type they did in (what is now) Bangladesh, and continue to do in Baluchistan, and if they gloat over 9/11 and 26/11, who and what can stop an angry general from ordering a nuclear strike?
The record shows that they are prone to using violent means. Look, for instance, at the number of wars they have dragged Pakistan into. If you count the two Afghan wars and the continuing terror enterprise, then Pakistan has fought a major war in every decade of its existence; sometimes even two wars simultaneously.
Or look at the number of coups it has had over the years. No other major country is held to ransom as whimsically as Pakistan is by its volatile generals.

Therefore, if they are happy providers for the likes of Mullah Omar, and long-time protectors of terror icons like Osama bin Laden, what is the guarantee that one day some angry general may not give in to the temptation of knocking more than a few heads and decide to hand over one or more of the bombs to a Mullah Omar or a Haqqani?

(Rajiv Dogra has served as India's consul general in Karachi and as ambassador to Romania and Italy. He can be contacted at ambraja@gmail.com)

0 Like 0 Dislike
Previous news Next news
Other news

Facing India in semis a tough challenge, says Clarke

Adelaide, March 20 (IANS) After overpowering Pakistan in the quarter-finals of the cricket Worl

Two killed, 10 injured in Jammu terror attack

Jammu, March 20 (IANS) Jammu and Kashmir Deputy Chief Minister Nirmal Singh on Friday said two

Rahul Gandhi vs Mohan Bhagwat: Rahul Gandhi attacks RSS chief, says Mohan Bhagwat insulted the Constitution

Former Congress President Sonia Gandhi inaugurated the party's new office on Wednesday. In this p

Two each from PDP, BJP and NC win Kashmir council polls

Jammu, March 2 (IANS) Two candidates each from the regional National Conference, the PDP and th

One mistake and three countries suffer losses worth millions! Former ICC official raises sharp questions about BCCI's decision.

Former ICC official Sami ul Hasan Burney has raised sharp questions about the functioning of the

India-US Trade Deal: Talks on trade deal between India and America today, Trump sent his special 'envoy'

US President Donald Trump has imposed a 50 percent tariff on India. Discussions on a trade deal b

Virat Kohli: Anurag Kashyap got emotional due to Virat Kohli's retirement, shared an old photo, and wrote his heart out

Cricketer Virat Kohli announced on Monday that he is retiring from Test cricket. His decision sho

UP Election 2022 Voting Percentage: 61.65% voting in the fourth phase, Pilibhit, and Lakhimpur Kheri remained ahead and Unnao left behind

In the fourth phase of Uttar Pradesh assembly elections 2022, 61.65 percent of votes were cast on

Students, staff with cough or cold to go on leave in Goa

Panaji, March 3 (IANS) As a precaution against swine flu, Goa's educational authorities have di

Inflation hit Bangladesh: Petrol and diesel prices increased by 52% for the first time since 1971, and angry people took to the streets

People in Bangladesh are troubled by inflation. Here the government has increased the prices of p

Sign up to write
Sign up now if you have flare of writing..
Login   |   Register
Follow Us
Indyaspeak @ Facebook Indyaspeak @ Twitter Indyaspeak @ Pinterest RSS



Play Free Quiz and Win Cash