
New Delhi, Feb 18 (IANS) The Supreme Court Wednesday said it was for elected representatives to take a call at what stage of proceedings a person facing criminal charges should be barred from contesting elections and the courts could not issue directions to the legislature and intrude in its domain.
A bench of Chief Justice H.L.Dattu, Justice A.K.Sikri and Justice Arun Mishra said this as senior counsel Rakesh Dwivedi appearing for NGO Public Interest Foundation contended that a person against whom criminal charges have been framed by the court should be debarred from contesting elections.
"This is for the representatives of the people to decide. We can't issue directions to legislature. They know how to run the country in a democratic manner," Chief Justice Dattu observed as Dwivedi pressed the plea that the framing of charges should be stage where a person facing criminal trial should be barred from contesting elections.
He said that this was also a stage where there was an judicial application of mind by the court before framing the charges.
"We should not be stepping into an area" earmarked for the legislature, the court said asking if it could issue direction to the parliament to legislate on barring the people against whom criminal charges have been framed.
"In the name of judicial activism we can't step in the arena earmarked for the law makers and legislature. Lines are marked demarcating the roles (of three organs of state)," the court said as the NGO urged the court to take recourse to its power under the constitution to issue direction to the Election Commission to bar people charged with criminal offences from contesting elections.
"Your submissions on the first thought look very very attractive. What a noble thought is this. But after a deeper consideration, no," Chief Justice Dattu said, adding: "We are bound by the decision of the constitution bench" which bars court's from issuing directions to legislature.
As Dwivedi pressed his plea, the court asked him: "What is the medium you want us to adopt... What you expect this court to do, tell us in nutshell."
Dwivedi told the court that it should direct the poll panel to reject the nomination papers of a candidate against whom charges have been framed and also ask the central government to consider the issue seriously.
At this, the court said: "It is not for us to say what is good governance. It is for them to see. It is not for us to advise the government what to do or not to do... It is left to them why a person with criminal antecedents is not to be made a minister."
Appearing for the central government, Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh told the court that disqualifications are mentioned in the Representation of People Act and court should not interfere with it and rewrite the law.
"You can't add further disqualifications," he told the court.
The hearing will continue on Thursday.
LAC: Army is building ponds near China border, 50 thousand soldiers are deployed in East Ladakh
The army is building ponds in the area to provide fresh drinking water to 50,000 soldiers deploye
Facebook's new name is Meta. Meta means metaverse. Metaverse means virtual reality. Simply put, a
Mongla Port Authority and EGIS India Private Limited have signed a contract for Project Managemen
The Income Tax Department has notified new income tax return forms giving details of the income f
More than 13 lakh pilgrims have registered for the Char Dham Yatra so far, but within two weeks o
Today the whole world is celebrating the new year. On this occasion, even in Corona-afflicted Chi
'Impose 100% tariff on India', America is pressuring the G7 countries. What does Trump want?
No one knows what US President Donald Trump will say at any moment and what he will do the next m
Turkey stuck on NATO's plan against Russia, condition for entry was placed before Sweden
Finland and Sweden formally applied to join the NATO alliance on 18 May. Turkey is furious with t
The Indian Navy is going to build a submarine museum in West Bengal. Its process has already star
New Delhi, Business Desk. Do you have any central employee in your family? If yes, then during th