New Delhi, Feb 18 (IANS) The Supreme Court Wednesday said it was for elected representatives to take a call at what stage of proceedings a person facing criminal charges should be barred from contesting elections and the courts could not issue directions to the legislature and intrude in its domain.
A bench of Chief Justice H.L.Dattu, Justice A.K.Sikri and Justice Arun Mishra said this as senior counsel Rakesh Dwivedi appearing for NGO Public Interest Foundation contended that a person against whom criminal charges have been framed by the court should be debarred from contesting elections.
"This is for the representatives of the people to decide. We can't issue directions to legislature. They know how to run the country in a democratic manner," Chief Justice Dattu observed as Dwivedi pressed the plea that the framing of charges should be stage where a person facing criminal trial should be barred from contesting elections.
He said that this was also a stage where there was an judicial application of mind by the court before framing the charges.
"We should not be stepping into an area" earmarked for the legislature, the court said asking if it could issue direction to the parliament to legislate on barring the people against whom criminal charges have been framed.
"In the name of judicial activism we can't step in the arena earmarked for the law makers and legislature. Lines are marked demarcating the roles (of three organs of state)," the court said as the NGO urged the court to take recourse to its power under the constitution to issue direction to the Election Commission to bar people charged with criminal offences from contesting elections.
"Your submissions on the first thought look very very attractive. What a noble thought is this. But after a deeper consideration, no," Chief Justice Dattu said, adding: "We are bound by the decision of the constitution bench" which bars court's from issuing directions to legislature.
As Dwivedi pressed his plea, the court asked him: "What is the medium you want us to adopt... What you expect this court to do, tell us in nutshell."
Dwivedi told the court that it should direct the poll panel to reject the nomination papers of a candidate against whom charges have been framed and also ask the central government to consider the issue seriously.
At this, the court said: "It is not for us to say what is good governance. It is for them to see. It is not for us to advise the government what to do or not to do... It is left to them why a person with criminal antecedents is not to be made a minister."
Appearing for the central government, Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh told the court that disqualifications are mentioned in the Representation of People Act and court should not interfere with it and rewrite the law.
"You can't add further disqualifications," he told the court.
The hearing will continue on Thursday.
The situation in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, is tense following the September 26th riots. Meanwhile,
In the 42nd match of IPL 2023, even though Rajasthan Royals had to face defeat at the hands of Mu
Pakistan captain Babar Azam has impressed everyone with his batting skills. He is called the 'Vir
Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 is all set to release in theatres this Diwali. The film stars many star actors
The mobiles of Muskan and Sahil, accused in the Saurabh murder case, are being made necessary evi
The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the government's decision on demonetization. However, the gove
Congress has criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his comments on the relevance of global
Good news: Padikkal returned to the RCB team after defeating Corona, now will make a comeback in IPL
Royal Challengers Bangalore says that opener Devadutt has joined the RCB team's bio bubble. He wa
Vijay Mallya contempt case: Supreme Court to hear last on January 18, said - have waited a lot
The Supreme Court made an important announcement on Tuesday in the contempt case against Vijay Ma
After touching the figure of 100 crores in the vaccination run to drive away from the corona epid
