Grok Row: X is responsible for the controversial content of the AI tool 'Grok'; Government sources make a big claim amid the controversy


Posted on 21st Mar 2025 11:46 am by rohit kumar

Social media platform X (formerly Twitter) may be responsible for all the content created by its artificial intelligence (AI) tool Grok. According to a government source, a legal opinion will be decided on this matter soon. Recently, some users asked questions related to Indian leaders on X to Grok, whose answers were found to be controversial at times. The source said that the Ministry of Electronics and IT is talking to social media platform X about this so that its way of working can be understood and assessed.

 

IT Ministry did not send any notice to Grok-X

 

Meanwhile, government sources claimed that the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has given information about X or Grok. The ministry has said that it has not sent any notice to Grok or X. The ministry is in talks with X and Grok. Officials of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology are talking to the officials of X and investigating at what level Indian law has been violated.

 

Government's strictness and old cases

Last year, Google's AI tool Gemini made objectionable comments about Prime Minister Narendra Modi, after which the government took immediate action and issued new guidelines on AI content. A government source said that guidelines are already in place regarding content on social media and companies must follow them.

 

X vs Government of India - case in court

Earlier today, X, a company owned by Grok AI, filed a case against the Government of India in the Karnataka High Court regarding Section 79(3) of the IT Act. The company says that the government is using this section to block content arbitrarily, which is against the decision of the Supreme Court. X has claimed that any content should be blocked only under Section 69A, but the government is creating a parallel system, which is against the law.

 

Section 79: Responsibility of social media platforms

Section 79(1) of the IT Act gives protection to social media platforms for the content posted by their users. But under Section 79(3), if a platform does not remove objectionable content despite government orders, it can face legal action. If a platform does not remove content within 36 hours, it risks losing 'safe harbor' protection and can be prosecuted under other laws, including the IPC.

1 Like 0 Dislike
Previous news Next news
Other news

HBSE 12th Result 2025: Jind students top the pass percentage, Nuh at the bottom

Haryana Board of School Education has released the result of class 12th. District Jind topped the

IND vs SA: 'If Bumrah's ball gets hit for a six, they'll make a documentary about it...', Indian commentator takes a dig at a Pakistani cricketer?

India defeated South Africa by 101 runs in the first T20I played in Cuttack. Batting first, the I

Delhi Bomb Threat: Dwarka court receives bomb threat via email, causing panic; police are investigating.

A sensational incident unfolded this morning at the Dwarka Court in the national capital, Delhi,

ICC ODI Rankings: King Kohli makes his mark, climbs to number two in ODI batsmen rankings, Hitman retains top spot.

Indian batting maestro Virat Kohli has once again demonstrated his dominance in ODI cricket. Indi

'If I could meet CM Yogi, I would find peace of mind,' says engineer Yuvraj's father.

Rajkumar Mehta, the father of engineer Yuvraj Mehta, who died in Noida, has expressed satisfactio

IPL 2025: 'Only one match is left now, we will celebrate together', said RCB captain Patidar after reaching the final for the fourth time

In IPL 2025 on Thursday, Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) defeated Punjab Kings by eight wickets

Mayday, Mayday... Who did the pilot call before the Ahmedabad plane crash?

Air India's plane AI-171 has crashed in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. There were 242 passengers on board th

Bigg Boss 19: Ashnoor's father clarifies 'body-shaming' advantage statement, blames Bigg Boss makers!

Before the finale, who can tell better than their family about which contestant is playing a toug

India does not recognize the international court whose decision Pakistan was boasting about; what is the whole matter?

Pakistan has welcomed the decision of the International Court of Arbitration, Permanent Court of

Pakistan Cricketer: 'The cheque received from the Pakistan government for the 2009 World Cup victory bounced', now Saeed Ajmal has exposed his country's secrets.

Former Pakistan spinner Saeed Ajmal has shared a shocking anecdote that exposes the management an

Sign up to write
Sign up now if you have flare of writing..
Login   |   Register
Follow Us
Indyaspeak @ Facebook Indyaspeak @ Twitter Indyaspeak @ Pinterest RSS



Play Free Quiz and Win Cash