Punjab PCC Chief and Navjot Singh Sidhu, who is contesting the assembly elections from the Amritsar seat, maybe in trouble in the 33-year-old road rage case. The Supreme Court heard the matter on Friday. The Supreme Court has issued notice to Sidhu on his plea seeking punishment of serious offense instead of simple injury, seeking his reply within two weeks. The victim's family has filed a petition seeking enhancement of punishment in the Rose Rage case for not a simple injury but a serious offense.
Earlier, the Supreme Court had decided only to decide whether Sidhu should be sentenced to jail or not, describing it as a case of simple injury. During the hearing in the Supreme Court on Friday, advocate Siddharth Luthra, on behalf of the petitioner's family, referred to the decisions in many old cases before the bench. He said there was no dispute over the road killing and its reason. He said that it is also clear from the post-mortem report that it is a case of murder and the injury was due to the attack and not the death due to a heart attack. The counsel for the petitioner sought further enhancement of the punishment to be awarded to the guilty.
At the same time, P Chidambaram on behalf of Navjot Singh Sidhu opposed the arguments of the petitioner. He accused the petitioner of giving a different direction to the matter. He said that this matter comes under section 323 of IPC. This incident is from 1998. In this, the court has sentenced the convict to one year in jail for causing minor injury. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul said that the previous decisions that were taken. According to him, it is not just a case of minor injury but it falls in a special category and now you have to defend with those arguments. Instead of the entire decision, you have to put your answer on these arguments of punishment. In the present situation, we want to focus the hearing on this only. Justice Kaul said that we do not want to open Pandora's box.
Earlier, Navjot Singh Sidhu had filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court. In this, Sidhu demanded dismissal of the review petition against him. Sidhu has requested that he should not be given a jail sentence. It also said that there is no valid ground for reconsideration of the decision. They also argue that the e-weapon was not recovered, there was no old enmity and also more than 3 decades have passed since the incident.
what is the whole matter?
On 27 December 1988, Navjot Singh Sidhu and his friend Rupinder Singh Sandhu had an altercation with an elder named Gurnam Singh over car parking in Patiala. Gurnam died in the fight. A case of culpable homicide was registered against Sidhu and his friend Rupinder Singh Sandhu. A case was registered on behalf of the Punjab government and the victim's family.
Corona has become deadly again in Punjab. A corona patient died in Mansa. At the same time, in Fa
Syed Mustafa Kamal, an MP from Pakistan, has praised India wholeheartedly. The Pakistani MP said
US President Joe Biden has described India as a strong partner of America. Has said that he will
The Indian team sweated it out in its first training session in New York before starting its camp
Donald Trump assassination attempt There was an unsuccessful attempt to assassinate former US Pre
Royal Challengers Bangalore defeated Delhi Capitals by 47 runs in the 62nd match of IPL 2024 on S
About 33 months ago on 12 November 2019, the Supreme Commander of Palestine Islamic Jihad, ie PIJ
Hardik Pandya was once a crucial part of India's Test team. His presence provided balance to the
A big dream project of Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar was completed on Gandhi Jayanti. Caste c
Kannada superstar Kiccha Sudeep is busy these days in the promotion of his upcoming film Vikrant
