Punjab PCC Chief and Navjot Singh Sidhu, who is contesting the assembly elections from the Amritsar seat, maybe in trouble in the 33-year-old road rage case. The Supreme Court heard the matter on Friday. The Supreme Court has issued notice to Sidhu on his plea seeking punishment of serious offense instead of simple injury, seeking his reply within two weeks. The victim's family has filed a petition seeking enhancement of punishment in the Rose Rage case for not a simple injury but a serious offense.
Earlier, the Supreme Court had decided only to decide whether Sidhu should be sentenced to jail or not, describing it as a case of simple injury. During the hearing in the Supreme Court on Friday, advocate Siddharth Luthra, on behalf of the petitioner's family, referred to the decisions in many old cases before the bench. He said there was no dispute over the road killing and its reason. He said that it is also clear from the post-mortem report that it is a case of murder and the injury was due to the attack and not the death due to a heart attack. The counsel for the petitioner sought further enhancement of the punishment to be awarded to the guilty.
At the same time, P Chidambaram on behalf of Navjot Singh Sidhu opposed the arguments of the petitioner. He accused the petitioner of giving a different direction to the matter. He said that this matter comes under section 323 of IPC. This incident is from 1998. In this, the court has sentenced the convict to one year in jail for causing minor injury. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul said that the previous decisions that were taken. According to him, it is not just a case of minor injury but it falls in a special category and now you have to defend with those arguments. Instead of the entire decision, you have to put your answer on these arguments of punishment. In the present situation, we want to focus the hearing on this only. Justice Kaul said that we do not want to open Pandora's box.
Earlier, Navjot Singh Sidhu had filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court. In this, Sidhu demanded dismissal of the review petition against him. Sidhu has requested that he should not be given a jail sentence. It also said that there is no valid ground for reconsideration of the decision. They also argue that the e-weapon was not recovered, there was no old enmity and also more than 3 decades have passed since the incident.
what is the whole matter?
On 27 December 1988, Navjot Singh Sidhu and his friend Rupinder Singh Sandhu had an altercation with an elder named Gurnam Singh over car parking in Patiala. Gurnam died in the fight. A case of culpable homicide was registered against Sidhu and his friend Rupinder Singh Sandhu. A case was registered on behalf of the Punjab government and the victim's family.
Guarding the India-China border will now be done by such soldiers who will be more capable of fig
Moto G82 5G Price In India: It seems that Motorola's series is not taking the name to the end, as
The Paris Olympics have ended, but Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat is still waiting for justice. Sh
The Indian selectors have announced the replacement of KL Rahul for the World Test Championship f
Due to the low-pressure area formed over the Bay of Bengal, there may be light or heavy rain in s
Since the end of the Zero Covid policy in China on January 8, the number of people coming and goi
Nainital DM Vandana Singh held a press conference on Friday regarding the attacks, stone pelting,
Defense Minister Rajnath Singh said on Monday that after Mahatma Gandhi, Prime Minister Narendra
India won the T20 World Cup match between India and Pakistan at Nassau County Stadium in New York
Ratan Tata Death: Film stars paid tribute to Ratan Tata, and said- the world has lost a visionary
The country's famous industrialist 'Ratan Tata' said goodbye to this world at the age of 86. Rata
