New Delhi, March 16 (IANS) The central government on Monday told the Delhi High Court that it has "no malafide intention" in issuing advocate Prashant Bhushan a passport with an year's validity instead of the usual 10 years and the decision was taken as criminal cases are pending against him.
The government told Justice Rajiv Shakdher that the action to issue a short validity passport of one year to Bhushan was completely in conformity with the prevailing provisions of an August 25, 1993 notification.
Bhushan has challenged the government's refusal to reissue him a passport with full validity.
Filing an affidavit, an under secretary in the ministry of external affairs, said: "Passport Authority, despite the fact that criminal cases were pending against the petitioner (Bhushan), had never denied the passport facility to him and also at any point of time had no intention to impede, hamper or confine the movement of the petitioner."
Bhushan has contended that merely because a few criminal cases pertaining to being part of an unlawful assembly are pending against him, the government denied him a passport with full validity.
The advocate, also a founding member of India Against Corruption (IAC), had staged a protest in August 2012 against the coal scam. Though the protest was non-violent, police had registered a few cases against IAC members including Bhushan for participating in an assembly which was declared unlawful. The cases are pending in Patiala House court here , the plea said.
Bhushan has also argued that the one-year restriction on reissuing the passport is "arbitrary, unreasonable and also discriminatory" and thus in violation of the constitution's article 14 (equality before law).
As per the plea, Bhushan had applied for renewal/reissue of the passport to the regional passport office in 2014. The government had informed him that in order to get his passport renewed, he needs to first obtain a no objection certificate (NOC) from the court where criminal cases are pending against him.
Though the metropolitan magistrate at Patiala House Courts granted him an NOC, he did not specify the duration of validity of the passport, which led to Bhushan being issued the passport on September 12, 2014 - valid only till September 11, 2015.
The government said Bhushan's request for the re-issue of the passport with full validity cannot be acceded to unless the concerned court issues a fresh order in this regard.
The government argued that as per the 1993 notification, a person with a criminal case pending and who applies for the issue or reissue of a passport, has to first obtain a NOC from the court where the case is pending and if the court does not lay down any time period for renewal, then a passport of only one year validity would be issued.
The court posted the matter for April 15.
Indian cricket fans witnessed a heartwarming moment in Ranchi late Thursday night. A viral video
56 pieces of the body, some cooked and eaten, sensational revelations in Kerala's sacrificial case
There has been a stir in Kerala after the case of human sacrifice due to black magic came to ligh
China, which claimed to withdraw its army after violent clashes in the Galvan Valley last year, h
Global Technology Summit 2022 is being organized in the national capital Delhi. In this conferenc
CISF commandos helping Metro's women commuters at night
New Delhi, March 9 (IANS) Apart from providing security t
Rohit on Virat: Kapil said throw Virat out, Rohit's answer - his words do not matter much to us
After the failure of the T20 series against England, there has been a demand to drop Virat Kohli
India Vs Australia: A three-match T20 series will be played between India and Australia from Sept
Reliance Jio's 'Super Speed' plan, 10 Gb data at 1 Gbps speed
new Delhi
Reliance Jio has emerged as the largest telecom company in the country in a ver
Kangana Ranaut, who has made a special place in the hearts of people with her strong acting, has
External Affairs Minister S.K. Jaishankar said that a "political effort" is going on to present t
