Penalty imposed for offence should be proportionate: SC


Posted on 23rd Mar 2015 11:14 am by mohit kumar

New Delhi, March 21 (IANS) The Supreme Court has said that it was incumbent upon courts to bear in mind the impact of the offence on the society including on the victim and there should be proportionality between the offence committed and the penalty imposed.

Holding that "sentencing for any offence has a social goal", a bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Prafulla C. Pant in a recent judgment said: "It is obligatory on the part of the Court to keep in mind the impact of the offence on the society, and its ramification including the repercussion on the victim."

"For the purpose of just and proper punishment, not only the accused must be made to realize that the crime was committed by him, but there should be proportionality between the offence committed and the penalty imposed," said Justice Pant pronouncing the judgment.

"In each case, facts and circumstances of that case are always required to be taken into consideration," the court said, while upholding the November 8, 2011 verdict of Punjab and Haryana High Court confirming the conviction of Assistant Sub-Inspector Sanjiv Kumar by a court in Punjab's Kapurthala.

Posted in a police station in Phagwara city, he entered the premises of a foreign exchange dealer and took away Rs.6,64,576 in Indian currency and foreign currency of the value of Rs. 13,44,500.

Not only that, he used a part of this money to foist a case on the firm's proprietor Sukhraj Singh, showing it as having been recovered from his car after it was intercepted at a checkpoint outside the town.

However, on investigation, this case was found to be false.

Thereafter Sukhraj Singh lodged a complaint with deputy inspector general of police, internal vigilance cell, recording the manner in which robbery was committed from the premises of his firm.

Sanjiv Kumar was convicted by the Kapurthala sessions court for offences under section 395 (Punishment for dacoity), section 450 (House trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment for life) and section 342 (Punishment for wrongful confinement) of Indian Penal Code.

While the trial court upon conviction sentenced him to varied terms of imprisonment and fines, the high court reduced the sentence to three years with enhanced fine.

0 Like 0 Dislike
Previous news Next news
Other news

I2U2 Summit: PM Modi said – Cooperative framework is a good model of cooperation amidst global uncertainties

I2U2 Summit: The first meeting of the leaders of the I2U2 group countries took place today. India

DGCA admits fault of IndiGo staff for stopping a disabled child from boarding aircraft, sent show-cause notice

Notice To Indigo Airlines: There was a case of Indigo preventing a disabled child from boarding t

Maharashtra: 9 killed in a horrific road accident on Mumbai-Goa highway, car badly damaged after colliding with a truck

A horrific road accident has been witnessed on the Mumbai-Goa highway in Maharashtra. Due to the

Gujarat Typhoid Cases: Over 110 cases of typhoid reported in Gandhinagar; Amit Shah issues important directives amid concerns.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has directed the administration to work on a war footing after susp

Priyanka Chopra: It was not easy for Priyanka to earn a name in Hollywood, she had to face these challenges

Priyanka Chopra is a veteran actress in Hindi cinema. He has worked in many best films in Bollywo

Narendra Modi wrote a letter to Imran Khan, what did he write in the letter?

While congratulating Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on the occasion of Pakistan Day, Prime Mi

Varun Dhawan: Why did Varun Dhawan call Home Minister Amit Shah 'Hanuman', he said- 'I am not a political man'

Bollywood actor Varun Dhawan is currently promoting his upcoming action drama film Baby John. Mea

Who is the President: Obama dominated the White House party, calling Biden the Vice President; US President wandering alone

It has been almost 15 months since Joe Biden became the US President. He is from the same Democra

SC-ST Act: Derogatory remarks against SC-ST in social media will go to jail, the important decision of the Kerala High Court

Attention Making derogatory or indecent remarks against people belonging to Scheduled Castes and

SC strict on promises of gifts of parties: Supreme Court seeks response from Center and Election Commission, tells petitioner - why mention only two parties

The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notices to the Central Government and the Election Commission

Sign up to write
Sign up now if you have flare of writing..
Login   |   Register
Follow Us
Indyaspeak @ Facebook Indyaspeak @ Twitter Indyaspeak @ Pinterest RSS



Play Free Quiz and Win Cash