The Supreme Court on Monday expressed strong displeasure over the filing of a new petition regarding the validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. A bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar indicated that it would not hear the pending scheduled petitions today, as a bench of two judges would sit today. A bench of three judges has already heard these petitions. The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of April.
There is a limit on filing a petition.
When senior advocate Indira Jaisingh mentioned a new petition, the Chief Justice said that we may not be able to consider it. The CJI said that there is a limit on filing petitions. So many IA (interim applications) have been filed. We may not be able to hear it.
On December 12 last year, the apex court had stayed the proceedings on 18 petitions of Hindu parties. These petitions demanded a survey of 10 mosques including Gyanvapi, Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura, and Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal. After this, the court listed all the petitions for hearing on February 17.
Owaisi, Iqra Hasan, and Congress filed petitions.
After December 12, Asaduddin Owaisi, SP MP Iqra Hasan, and Congress also filed petitions. In this, there was a demand to effectively implement the Places of Worship Act-1991 across the country. The court has already agreed to hear Owaisi's petition. On February 14, Iqra Hasan demanded to curb the increasing trend of legal action by targeting mosques and dargahs. He says that this threatens communal harmony and the secular fabric of the country.
Hindu organizations also filed petitions.
All India Sant Samiti has also filed a petition. At the same time, the bench is currently hearing six petitions. One of these petitions is from lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay. Upadhyay has challenged various provisions of the Places of Worship Act 1991 in his petition. They have demanded to separate sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Act.
What is the Places of Worship Act- 1991?
The Places of Worship Act- 1991 prevents any change in the form of religious places. According to the law, the religious place will remain in the same form as it was on 15 August 1947. No changes can be made to it. However, the Ram Janmabhoomi case was kept out of this.
Several families have been displaced following protests in Murshidabad over the Waqf (Amendment)
Leader of Opposition in Delhi Assembly Atishi has written a letter to Chief Minister Rekha Gupta
During the "Weekend Ka Vaar" episode of "Bigg Boss 19," Salman Khan, like every week, scolded the
Nikki's murder case has given rise to many such questions, whose answers have become necessary fo
On Tuesday, terrorists in Pahalgam, Jammu, and Kashmir, killed at least 26 people by firing indis
'Operation Sindoor is going on...', Rajnath Singh reveals; 100 terrorists killed in India's action.
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said in the all-party meeting that at least 100 terrorists were ki
On Wednesday, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif reiterated that he is ready to hold talks wi
Union Minister for Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju said that the purpose of passing the Waqf Amendm
Prime Minister Narendra Modi met the champion Indian team at his residence in Delhi. During the m
The Supreme Court has given its verdict in the case of the felling of trees in the protected Ridg
