The Supreme Court on Monday expressed strong displeasure over the filing of a new petition regarding the validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. A bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar indicated that it would not hear the pending scheduled petitions today, as a bench of two judges would sit today. A bench of three judges has already heard these petitions. The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of April.
There is a limit on filing a petition.
When senior advocate Indira Jaisingh mentioned a new petition, the Chief Justice said that we may not be able to consider it. The CJI said that there is a limit on filing petitions. So many IA (interim applications) have been filed. We may not be able to hear it.
On December 12 last year, the apex court had stayed the proceedings on 18 petitions of Hindu parties. These petitions demanded a survey of 10 mosques including Gyanvapi, Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura, and Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal. After this, the court listed all the petitions for hearing on February 17.
Owaisi, Iqra Hasan, and Congress filed petitions.
After December 12, Asaduddin Owaisi, SP MP Iqra Hasan, and Congress also filed petitions. In this, there was a demand to effectively implement the Places of Worship Act-1991 across the country. The court has already agreed to hear Owaisi's petition. On February 14, Iqra Hasan demanded to curb the increasing trend of legal action by targeting mosques and dargahs. He says that this threatens communal harmony and the secular fabric of the country.
Hindu organizations also filed petitions.
All India Sant Samiti has also filed a petition. At the same time, the bench is currently hearing six petitions. One of these petitions is from lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay. Upadhyay has challenged various provisions of the Places of Worship Act 1991 in his petition. They have demanded to separate sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Act.
What is the Places of Worship Act- 1991?
The Places of Worship Act- 1991 prevents any change in the form of religious places. According to the law, the religious place will remain in the same form as it was on 15 August 1947. No changes can be made to it. However, the Ram Janmabhoomi case was kept out of this.
Security has been tightened at several district courts in Delhi following a bomb threat on Tuesda
After the CJI, another judge was attacked with a shoe; the court gave its verdict on the attacker.
Recently, a man threw a shoe at CJI BR Gavai in the Supreme Court. This incident sparked a new de
US President Donald Trump has imposed an additional 25% tax on goods coming from India. This tax
Changes have been made in the passport rules for minorities coming to India from Pakistan, Afghan
Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath said that patience and unity are our biggest assets during a natio
Bhojpuri superstar Pawan Singh has been granted Y-category security. According to Home Ministry s
Trouble for the makers of Dhurandhar, Major Mohit Sharma's family approaches Delhi High Court
Directed by Aditya Dhar, Dhurandhar's film is just seven days away from release. The film has bee
Kapil Dev, the captain who led India to the 1983 World Cup title, has expressed his opinion on Ga
The Haryana government has decided to hand over the investigation of the death of play school tea
India is a major trading partner of the US. Last year, trade between the two countries was around
