The Supreme Court on Monday expressed strong displeasure over the filing of a new petition regarding the validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. A bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar indicated that it would not hear the pending scheduled petitions today, as a bench of two judges would sit today. A bench of three judges has already heard these petitions. The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of April.
There is a limit on filing a petition.
When senior advocate Indira Jaisingh mentioned a new petition, the Chief Justice said that we may not be able to consider it. The CJI said that there is a limit on filing petitions. So many IA (interim applications) have been filed. We may not be able to hear it.
On December 12 last year, the apex court had stayed the proceedings on 18 petitions of Hindu parties. These petitions demanded a survey of 10 mosques including Gyanvapi, Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura, and Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal. After this, the court listed all the petitions for hearing on February 17.
Owaisi, Iqra Hasan, and Congress filed petitions.
After December 12, Asaduddin Owaisi, SP MP Iqra Hasan, and Congress also filed petitions. In this, there was a demand to effectively implement the Places of Worship Act-1991 across the country. The court has already agreed to hear Owaisi's petition. On February 14, Iqra Hasan demanded to curb the increasing trend of legal action by targeting mosques and dargahs. He says that this threatens communal harmony and the secular fabric of the country.
Hindu organizations also filed petitions.
All India Sant Samiti has also filed a petition. At the same time, the bench is currently hearing six petitions. One of these petitions is from lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay. Upadhyay has challenged various provisions of the Places of Worship Act 1991 in his petition. They have demanded to separate sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Act.
What is the Places of Worship Act- 1991?
The Places of Worship Act- 1991 prevents any change in the form of religious places. According to the law, the religious place will remain in the same form as it was on 15 August 1947. No changes can be made to it. However, the Ram Janmabhoomi case was kept out of this.
LSG star Digvesh Rathi gets a big punishment for 'notebook' celebration, BCCI imposes a hefty fine
Lucknow Super Giants spinner Digvesh Singh Rathi had to pay heavily for doing a 'notebook' celebr
'Then America will be destroyed...', Trump's anger erupts in a US court over tariffs
Since coming to power in January 2025, Trump has given the slogan of 'Make America Great Again' (
Union Home Minister Amit Shah has said that the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, will d
Union Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has said that a large reserve of crude oil and gas ha
A situation of war had arisen between India and Pakistan in the past few days. Both countries wer
On completion of 100 days of BJP-led Delhi government, the '100 Din Seva Ke' program has been org
After the stampede incident at New Delhi station, the Standing Committee of Parliament has also s
Today is the second day of PM Modi's Bihar tour. Today PM Modi will address a public meeting in B
"We stand for each other...," an Arunachal woman harassed in China replies to trollers
Pema Wang Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh who faced harassment in China, has now targete
All the six heli companies operating helicopter services for Kedarnath Dham returned from Kedargh
