The Supreme Court on Monday expressed strong displeasure over the filing of a new petition regarding the validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. A bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar indicated that it would not hear the pending scheduled petitions today, as a bench of two judges would sit today. A bench of three judges has already heard these petitions. The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of April.
There is a limit on filing a petition.
When senior advocate Indira Jaisingh mentioned a new petition, the Chief Justice said that we may not be able to consider it. The CJI said that there is a limit on filing petitions. So many IA (interim applications) have been filed. We may not be able to hear it.
On December 12 last year, the apex court had stayed the proceedings on 18 petitions of Hindu parties. These petitions demanded a survey of 10 mosques including Gyanvapi, Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura, and Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal. After this, the court listed all the petitions for hearing on February 17.
Owaisi, Iqra Hasan, and Congress filed petitions.
After December 12, Asaduddin Owaisi, SP MP Iqra Hasan, and Congress also filed petitions. In this, there was a demand to effectively implement the Places of Worship Act-1991 across the country. The court has already agreed to hear Owaisi's petition. On February 14, Iqra Hasan demanded to curb the increasing trend of legal action by targeting mosques and dargahs. He says that this threatens communal harmony and the secular fabric of the country.
Hindu organizations also filed petitions.
All India Sant Samiti has also filed a petition. At the same time, the bench is currently hearing six petitions. One of these petitions is from lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay. Upadhyay has challenged various provisions of the Places of Worship Act 1991 in his petition. They have demanded to separate sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Act.
What is the Places of Worship Act- 1991?
The Places of Worship Act- 1991 prevents any change in the form of religious places. According to the law, the religious place will remain in the same form as it was on 15 August 1947. No changes can be made to it. However, the Ram Janmabhoomi case was kept out of this.
UK PM in India: PM Modi and Starmer to meet today; will discuss bilateral issues and Vision 2035
Starmer, who is on his first visit to India since assuming office as Prime Minister, will meet wi
'Everyone should know Marathi in Maharashtra', hooliganism by MNS workers; slapped the shopkeeper.
The video of hooliganism by MNS leaders in the Mira Bhayander area of Maharashtra is going
Aam Aadmi Party MLAs created a ruckus during the address of Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena in the
Former Indian spinner Ravichandran Ashwin made headlines with a bold statement after the Indian w
The Indian team, led by Suryakumar Yadav, maintained its unbeaten run in the Asia Cup, defeating
After Ranveer Allahabadia's objectionable statement on stand-up comedian Samay Raina's show 'Indi
Muslim employees got this exemption in Andhra Pradesh, uproar erupted in Telangana.
After the Congress-led Telangana government, the Telugu Desam Party (TDP)-led NDA government in A
A new district named Kalyan Singh Nagar could be created by incorporating the Atrauli-Gangiri and
Indian ODI team vice-captain Shreyas Iyer has been admitted to a hospital in Sydney and is curren
After the 7-wicket defeat to Punjab Kings, Mumbai Indians captain Hardik Pandya spoke openly abou
