The Supreme Court on Monday expressed strong displeasure over the filing of a new petition regarding the validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. A bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar indicated that it would not hear the pending scheduled petitions today, as a bench of two judges would sit today. A bench of three judges has already heard these petitions. The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of April.
There is a limit on filing a petition.
When senior advocate Indira Jaisingh mentioned a new petition, the Chief Justice said that we may not be able to consider it. The CJI said that there is a limit on filing petitions. So many IA (interim applications) have been filed. We may not be able to hear it.
On December 12 last year, the apex court had stayed the proceedings on 18 petitions of Hindu parties. These petitions demanded a survey of 10 mosques including Gyanvapi, Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura, and Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal. After this, the court listed all the petitions for hearing on February 17.
Owaisi, Iqra Hasan, and Congress filed petitions.
After December 12, Asaduddin Owaisi, SP MP Iqra Hasan, and Congress also filed petitions. In this, there was a demand to effectively implement the Places of Worship Act-1991 across the country. The court has already agreed to hear Owaisi's petition. On February 14, Iqra Hasan demanded to curb the increasing trend of legal action by targeting mosques and dargahs. He says that this threatens communal harmony and the secular fabric of the country.
Hindu organizations also filed petitions.
All India Sant Samiti has also filed a petition. At the same time, the bench is currently hearing six petitions. One of these petitions is from lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay. Upadhyay has challenged various provisions of the Places of Worship Act 1991 in his petition. They have demanded to separate sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Act.
What is the Places of Worship Act- 1991?
The Places of Worship Act- 1991 prevents any change in the form of religious places. According to the law, the religious place will remain in the same form as it was on 15 August 1947. No changes can be made to it. However, the Ram Janmabhoomi case was kept out of this.
The trailer for Rishabh Shetty's most anticipated film of the year, "Kantara Chapter 1," has been
Delhi Traffic Advisory on Chhath Puja: Large crowds are expected at various ghats across Delhi du
Gwalior resident Tanya Mittal has been in the news ever since she entered the reality show "Bigg
HBSE 12th Result 2025: Jind students top the pass percentage, Nuh at the bottom
Haryana Board of School Education has released the result of class 12th. District Jind topped the
Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju signed the bilateral Hajj Agreement for 2026 in Jedd
Missing Ladies was released in theaters last year and was highly appreciated by the audience and
Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) has decided that it will run a campaign to free all Hindu temples fro
The person who fired at Salman Khan's house did not get bail. The special court rejected the plea.
Fans are very crazy about Salman Khan. Bhaijaan's fans pray for the actor's safety every moment.
Due to continuous rain in the mountains, the water level of the Yamuna in the capital has reached
The Pakistan Cricket Board has claimed that it has made huge profits from hosting the Champions T
