The Supreme Court on Monday expressed strong displeasure over the filing of a new petition regarding the validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. A bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar indicated that it would not hear the pending scheduled petitions today, as a bench of two judges would sit today. A bench of three judges has already heard these petitions. The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of April.
There is a limit on filing a petition.
When senior advocate Indira Jaisingh mentioned a new petition, the Chief Justice said that we may not be able to consider it. The CJI said that there is a limit on filing petitions. So many IA (interim applications) have been filed. We may not be able to hear it.
On December 12 last year, the apex court had stayed the proceedings on 18 petitions of Hindu parties. These petitions demanded a survey of 10 mosques including Gyanvapi, Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura, and Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal. After this, the court listed all the petitions for hearing on February 17.
Owaisi, Iqra Hasan, and Congress filed petitions.
After December 12, Asaduddin Owaisi, SP MP Iqra Hasan, and Congress also filed petitions. In this, there was a demand to effectively implement the Places of Worship Act-1991 across the country. The court has already agreed to hear Owaisi's petition. On February 14, Iqra Hasan demanded to curb the increasing trend of legal action by targeting mosques and dargahs. He says that this threatens communal harmony and the secular fabric of the country.
Hindu organizations also filed petitions.
All India Sant Samiti has also filed a petition. At the same time, the bench is currently hearing six petitions. One of these petitions is from lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay. Upadhyay has challenged various provisions of the Places of Worship Act 1991 in his petition. They have demanded to separate sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Act.
What is the Places of Worship Act- 1991?
The Places of Worship Act- 1991 prevents any change in the form of religious places. According to the law, the religious place will remain in the same form as it was on 15 August 1947. No changes can be made to it. However, the Ram Janmabhoomi case was kept out of this.
After his divorce from choreographer Dhanashree, cricketer Yuzvendra Chahal was often seen with R
A division bench of the Kerala High Court heard the case of Munambam land dispute in Kerala on Mo
The Joint Parliamentary Committee constituted for detailed deliberations on the One Nation, One E
Hardik Pandya once appeared on the show Coffee with Karan with his friend KL Rahul. When this sho
Comedian Kunal Kamra is constantly in the headlines after making controversial comments about Mah
Rajasthan Royals and Delhi Capitals will try to forget their defeat in the last match and make a
IPL 2025: BCCI's big decision amid India-Pakistan tension, IPL 2025 season postponed indefinitely
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has taken a big decision on Friday amid the ongo
US President and tariff king Donald Trump has made another big bang. After imposing reciprocal ta
India has defeated Pakistan by six wickets in the Champions Trophy. In this match played at Dubai
Tamil superstar and Tamilaga Vetri Kazhagam (TVK) chief Thalapathy Vijay is once again embroiled
