The Supreme Court on Monday expressed strong displeasure over the filing of a new petition regarding the validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. A bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar indicated that it would not hear the pending scheduled petitions today, as a bench of two judges would sit today. A bench of three judges has already heard these petitions. The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of April.
There is a limit on filing a petition.
When senior advocate Indira Jaisingh mentioned a new petition, the Chief Justice said that we may not be able to consider it. The CJI said that there is a limit on filing petitions. So many IA (interim applications) have been filed. We may not be able to hear it.
On December 12 last year, the apex court had stayed the proceedings on 18 petitions of Hindu parties. These petitions demanded a survey of 10 mosques including Gyanvapi, Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura, and Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal. After this, the court listed all the petitions for hearing on February 17.
Owaisi, Iqra Hasan, and Congress filed petitions.
After December 12, Asaduddin Owaisi, SP MP Iqra Hasan, and Congress also filed petitions. In this, there was a demand to effectively implement the Places of Worship Act-1991 across the country. The court has already agreed to hear Owaisi's petition. On February 14, Iqra Hasan demanded to curb the increasing trend of legal action by targeting mosques and dargahs. He says that this threatens communal harmony and the secular fabric of the country.
Hindu organizations also filed petitions.
All India Sant Samiti has also filed a petition. At the same time, the bench is currently hearing six petitions. One of these petitions is from lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay. Upadhyay has challenged various provisions of the Places of Worship Act 1991 in his petition. They have demanded to separate sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Act.
What is the Places of Worship Act- 1991?
The Places of Worship Act- 1991 prevents any change in the form of religious places. According to the law, the religious place will remain in the same form as it was on 15 August 1947. No changes can be made to it. However, the Ram Janmabhoomi case was kept out of this.
IND vs SA: What did Rohit Sharma say after Virat Kohli's century? Arshdeep Singh reveals in video
India's run-machine Virat Kohli scored his 52nd career century in the first ODI against South Afr
The flag hoisting ceremony at the Ayodhya Ram Temple was completed. With the press of a button, P
TMC MP called Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan a 'broker', BJP said- apologies
Trinamool Congress MP Kailash Banerjee on Tuesday accused Agriculture and Rural Development Minis
Opposition parties on Wednesday attacked the central government after US President Donald Trump i
There is both a story and silence behind every storm. Operation Sindoor is not over yet, but its
Bangladesh connection has been revealed in the violence that broke out in Nagpur, Maharashtra on
'What is the solution? We will continuously monitor: SC takes a tough stand on Delhi air pollution.
The suffocating air in Delhi-NCR is making life difficult for people. Regarding the air pollution
With the emergence of another video related to YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, who was caught on charges
Recently, cricketer Virat Kohli claimed that the post got liked automatically on Instagram. Now a
Under pressure from allies, the BJP made some compromises in the provisions of the Waqf Amendment
