The Supreme Court on Monday expressed strong displeasure over the filing of a new petition regarding the validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991. A bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar indicated that it would not hear the pending scheduled petitions today, as a bench of two judges would sit today. A bench of three judges has already heard these petitions. The court adjourned the hearing till the first week of April.
There is a limit on filing a petition.
When senior advocate Indira Jaisingh mentioned a new petition, the Chief Justice said that we may not be able to consider it. The CJI said that there is a limit on filing petitions. So many IA (interim applications) have been filed. We may not be able to hear it.
On December 12 last year, the apex court had stayed the proceedings on 18 petitions of Hindu parties. These petitions demanded a survey of 10 mosques including Gyanvapi, Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura, and Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal. After this, the court listed all the petitions for hearing on February 17.
Owaisi, Iqra Hasan, and Congress filed petitions.
After December 12, Asaduddin Owaisi, SP MP Iqra Hasan, and Congress also filed petitions. In this, there was a demand to effectively implement the Places of Worship Act-1991 across the country. The court has already agreed to hear Owaisi's petition. On February 14, Iqra Hasan demanded to curb the increasing trend of legal action by targeting mosques and dargahs. He says that this threatens communal harmony and the secular fabric of the country.
Hindu organizations also filed petitions.
All India Sant Samiti has also filed a petition. At the same time, the bench is currently hearing six petitions. One of these petitions is from lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay. Upadhyay has challenged various provisions of the Places of Worship Act 1991 in his petition. They have demanded to separate sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Act.
What is the Places of Worship Act- 1991?
The Places of Worship Act- 1991 prevents any change in the form of religious places. According to the law, the religious place will remain in the same form as it was on 15 August 1947. No changes can be made to it. However, the Ram Janmabhoomi case was kept out of this.
We had come to see our stars. We had bought tickets for the ceremony but could not enter the stad
Union Minister Nitin Gadkari on Monday expressed deep concern over Delhi's pollution. He said tha
Maharashtra: MNS rally against traders' protest, police detain activists
In response to the protest by traders against the slapping of a food stall owner in Maharashtra,
GrokAI: Now Grok abuses Tej Pratap, has Elon Musk's AI gone out of control?
X's AI chatbot Grok has abused RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav's son Tej Pratap Yadav in his tweet ab
In the Raja Raghuvanshi murder case, Shillong police have also arrested contractor Lokendra Tomar
There was celebration in some places and sadness in others when the Waqf Amendment Bill was passe
'Salman Khan has grown old', 'He needs to focus on his fitness a little'... Those giving such adv
A shocking incident came to light on Thursday at Ra Studio in Powai, Mumbai. A man held 15 to 20
Storm and rain wreak havoc in NCR, 4 killed in Ghaziabad-Gautam Buddha Nagar.
The strong storm and hailstorm that came at 8:30 p.m. on Wednesday night caused widespread devast
Karnataka government angry with Kamal Haasan's statement, actor's films may be banned.
Kamal Haasan's controversial statement on Kannada language has created a storm in Karnataka. Karn
