The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the order to remove the mosque from the Allahabad High Court premises. The top court, while upholding the High Court's decision, has given three months to remove the mosque. Also allowed the petitioner Waqf Masjid High Court to make a representation to the state government for alternative land.
A bench of Justice MR Shah and Justice CT Ravikumar said, "We do not see any reason to interfere with the order of the High Court." However, it would be open to the petitioners to make a detailed representation to the State Government seeking alternative land, which may be considered following the law.
The bench told the petitioners opposing the removal of the mosque, the land was a leasehold property that was terminated. They cannot claim to uphold it as a matter of right. The apex court was hearing a petition filed by the Waqf Masjid High Court and the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board challenging the Allahabad High Court order.
If the mosque is not removed in three months, the High Court has the option of demolishing it.
We give three months to the petitioners to remove the construction in question, the bench said. If the construction is not removed within three months from today, then the option of removing or demolishing it will be open to other authorities including the High Court.
Kapil Sibal, counsel for the mosque management committee, said the mosque is from the 1950s. It cannot be asked to be removed just like that. In 2017, the government changed and everything changed. A public interest litigation was filed 10 days after the formation of the new government. As long as they provide us with the land, we have no problem moving to an alternate location.
High Court lawyer Rakesh Dwivedi said it is a case of complete fraud. Renewal applications came twice and there was not even a whisper that the mosque had been built. It was used for the public. Seeking renovation, said it is required for residential purposes. The mere fact that they are offering prayers will not make it a mosque. If prayers are allowed in the verandah of the Supreme Court or High Court for convenience, it does not become a mosque.
Also Read: TikTok Ban in US: America in preparation to ban Tiktok, White House agreed on the bill for a ban
AQI Delhi: The amount of pollution in Delhi-NCR is not showing any signs of reduction despite sev
AQI Update: A slight decline in pollution level was seen in Delhi-NCR last Monday, but once again
In the first match of the three T20 match series between India and England, India had to face def
Jolly LLB 3: 'Don't worry about us', Bombay High Court dismisses petition against 'Jolly LLB 3'
The Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition filed against actor Akshay Kumar's upcoming film "
The Haryana Election 2024 Congress has suffered a second consecutive setback in the Rai constitue
Mukhtar Ansari Death Mukhtar Ansari was not only a criminal but he also had a stronghold in the p
Dream Girl 2 Box Office Collection Day 14: The pace of Ayushmann Khurrana's film Dream Girl 2 has
The UK government has announced that it will add India to the list of safe states. After this, th
Shashi Tharoor attacked Nitish Kumar The entire opposition is upset with Bihar Chief Minister Nit
Mumbai Weather Today: It is raining continuously in Mumbai. Which is affecting the lives of the p
