The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the order to remove the mosque from the Allahabad High Court premises. The top court, while upholding the High Court's decision, has given three months to remove the mosque. Also allowed the petitioner Waqf Masjid High Court to make a representation to the state government for alternative land.
A bench of Justice MR Shah and Justice CT Ravikumar said, "We do not see any reason to interfere with the order of the High Court." However, it would be open to the petitioners to make a detailed representation to the State Government seeking alternative land, which may be considered following the law.
The bench told the petitioners opposing the removal of the mosque, the land was a leasehold property that was terminated. They cannot claim to uphold it as a matter of right. The apex court was hearing a petition filed by the Waqf Masjid High Court and the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board challenging the Allahabad High Court order.
If the mosque is not removed in three months, the High Court has the option of demolishing it.
We give three months to the petitioners to remove the construction in question, the bench said. If the construction is not removed within three months from today, then the option of removing or demolishing it will be open to other authorities including the High Court.
Kapil Sibal, counsel for the mosque management committee, said the mosque is from the 1950s. It cannot be asked to be removed just like that. In 2017, the government changed and everything changed. A public interest litigation was filed 10 days after the formation of the new government. As long as they provide us with the land, we have no problem moving to an alternate location.
High Court lawyer Rakesh Dwivedi said it is a case of complete fraud. Renewal applications came twice and there was not even a whisper that the mosque had been built. It was used for the public. Seeking renovation, said it is required for residential purposes. The mere fact that they are offering prayers will not make it a mosque. If prayers are allowed in the verandah of the Supreme Court or High Court for convenience, it does not become a mosque.
Also Read: TikTok Ban in US: America in preparation to ban Tiktok, White House agreed on the bill for a ban
Manish Sisodia has raised the question of Prime Minister Narendra Modi being educated by writing
Bollywood actress Mamta Kulkarni has today resigned from the post of Mahamandaleshwar of Kinnar A
The fifth day of the Paris Olympics was good for the Indian team. On Wednesday, Indian shooter Sw
On Tuesday, the final match of IPL was played between PBKS i.e. Punjab Kings and RCB i.e. Royal C
India-Pakistan Ceasefire: 32 airports closed amid India-Pakistan tension reopened; operations resume
32 airports of the country which were closed due to the recent military tension between India and
On Thursday, two days after the IPL 2025 final, RJ Mahvash posted in support of Yuzvendra Chahal,
The Indian team is to tour Sri Lanka for a limited-overs series later this month. The team has no
The entire North India including Delhi-NCR is facing the brunt of severe cold these days. Cold wa
Sidharth Malhotra has returned to theaters after a long time. The actor is entertaining fans on t
If Team India does not play, will the Asia Cup 2025 be cancelled? PCB fears loss of crores
The Asia Cup 2025 to be held in the month of September is in danger. Reports have emerged that th
