Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has made a big statement on the division of powers. He said that in a country like ours or any democracy, how can the Chief Justice be involved in the appointment of the CBI Director as per the statutory directive? The Vice President asked whether there could be any legal logic for this?
The time has come to reconsider
Jagdeep Dhankhar said that the statutory directives were made because the executive of that time had surrendered before the judicial decision. But now the time has come to reconsider it. He said that this does not match with democracy. He asked how the Chief Justice of India be involved in any executive appointment?
Decisions have importance
The Vice President said that the public presence of the judiciary should be mainly through decisions. The decisions speak for themselves. Decisions are important. He said that according to the Constitution if the decision comes from the Supreme Court, it has to be implemented.
Dhankhar said that any other way of expression other than the decision weakens the institutional dignity. He said that when we look at the world, we do not find judges considering all the issues in the way we see here.
The largest democracy will not tolerate it.
The Vice President said that executive rule by judicial order is a constitutional contradiction. The world's largest democracy cannot tolerate this. He said that when institutions forget their limits, democracy remembers its wounds. Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar said this at the National Judicial Academy in Bhopal.
Institutions should work within limits.
Dhankhar said that for jurisdictional respect and honor, it is necessary that institutions work within defined constitutional limits. Maintain a collaborative dialogue and keep national interest in mind. He said that Parliament has supremacy in law-making.
Judicial review is required so that the law is according to the Constitution. But when it comes to amending the Indian Constitution, the power lies only with the Parliament. No interference can be made in this under any pretext.
Interference is not according to democracy.
Any interference from any source from the legislature or the judiciary is against the Constitution. This is certainly not in keeping with democracy. He said accountability applies when an elected government plays executive roles. Governments are accountable to the legislature and, from time to time, to the voters. If executive governance is outsourced, accountability will not apply.
Tom Cruise is currently in the limelight among the Indian audience with his film 'Mission Impossi
Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi recently praised a soldier, knowing the reason behind which yo
Shares of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) fell nearly two per cent on Monday. The company has sai
Mahesh Babu is in deep trouble in a money laundering case, ED sends a summons to appear in office.
South superstar Mahesh Babu (Mahesh Babu ED summon), who is also the husband of Bollywood actress
MK Stalin: 'Yogi Adityanath wants to lecture us on hatred, this is comedy', Stalin targets UP CM
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin has attacked Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath, expressing str
The journey of Harmanpreet Kaur, captain of the world-defeating Indian women's cricket team, bega
Railways have also come into alert mode amid the air strikes between India and Pakistan on Thursd
The Election Commission has released the 2002 voter list of 293 assembly constituencies of 24 dis
The continuous rain in the monsoon has broken the record of the last five years. After the year 2
Diljit Dosanjh's much awaited film Sardar Ji 3 has been in controversy since the trailer was rele
