In an important decision, the Supreme Court issued an order to IIT Bombay to hand over his degree to a student suffering from a 'learning disability. The student has done a Master in Design course from the institute. Court ordered that the student has completed his degree. So he should be handed over his degree.
A bench of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, Ravindra Bhat, and Sudhanshu Dhulia directed the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay to take appropriate steps to hand over his degree and all other necessary certificates to the appellant Naman Verma within four weeks. The Court has exercised its special power Article 142 in this matter. The court said that the future of the child cannot be left in limbo. Let us tell you that Article 142 is used by the court in very special circumstances.
The Supreme Court was hearing a petition filed by a student named Naman Verma. The student challenged the decision given by the Bombay High Court on April 17, 2018. The student claims to be suffering from learning disabilities. The student had filed a petition before the Bombay High Court in 2013 demanding that he be admitted to the Master in Design course under Article 226 of the Constitution. Based on the interim order of the court, the student got admission to the institute. After this, the student completed his degree.
However, when the time came for the final disposal of the case, after considering various issues, the Bombay High Court did not recognize the right of the appellant under the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights, and Full Participation) Act, 1995.
The issue before the Bombay High Court was whether the appellant has completed the course under the interim directions and what will be his fate going forward. In the case, the High Court had said that we are of the view that however the petitioner may be entitled to be declared successful in the course. In the absence of necessary powers under Article, we are unable to grant him any further relief in this petition.
Hearing the matter, the Supreme Court observed that the 1995 Act has now been replaced by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Supreme Court further said that we High Court, however, affirm the view taken by the High Court on issues of law, which came to be determined by the High Court. We do not agree to cancel his candidature because the appellant has completed the course to jeopardize his eligibility.
Also Read: Rajasthan: Rajasthan constable recruitment exam paper also leaked after REET, exam canceled
Weather Update: Relief from humid heat, heavy rain in Delhi-NCR; Know when the monsoon will arrive
Monsoon has knocked in many states of the country. People were in bad condition due to the scorch
The budget session of the Parliament is going to start today. The budget session will be held in
SSC has released the CGL Final Revised Result (SSC CGL 2023 Final Revised Results). The revised r
Prime Minister Narendra Modi will participate in the first virtual summit of I2U2 on Thursday (14
The Union Health Ministry will launch a mega drive for voluntary blood donation from September 17
Lok Sabha Election 2024: Notification has been issued for the first phase of Lok Sabha elections.
The Indian team is set to face Pakistan in the Under-19 World Cup, currently being played in Zimb
Sidhu can come out on Republic Day: 1-year sentence in road rage case, jailed for 6 months
Navjot Singh Sidhu, who is serving a one-year sentence in a 34-year-old road rage case, may be re
The question remains as to who will be the CM face in Mahayuti and Maha Vikas Aghadi in Maharasht
Royal Challengers Bangalore defeated Delhi Capitals by 47 runs in the 62nd match of IPL 2024 on S
