In an important decision, the Supreme Court issued an order to IIT Bombay to hand over his degree to a student suffering from a 'learning disability. The student has done a Master in Design course from the institute. Court ordered that the student has completed his degree. So he should be handed over his degree.
A bench of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, Ravindra Bhat, and Sudhanshu Dhulia directed the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay to take appropriate steps to hand over his degree and all other necessary certificates to the appellant Naman Verma within four weeks. The Court has exercised its special power Article 142 in this matter. The court said that the future of the child cannot be left in limbo. Let us tell you that Article 142 is used by the court in very special circumstances.
The Supreme Court was hearing a petition filed by a student named Naman Verma. The student challenged the decision given by the Bombay High Court on April 17, 2018. The student claims to be suffering from learning disabilities. The student had filed a petition before the Bombay High Court in 2013 demanding that he be admitted to the Master in Design course under Article 226 of the Constitution. Based on the interim order of the court, the student got admission to the institute. After this, the student completed his degree.
However, when the time came for the final disposal of the case, after considering various issues, the Bombay High Court did not recognize the right of the appellant under the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights, and Full Participation) Act, 1995.
The issue before the Bombay High Court was whether the appellant has completed the course under the interim directions and what will be his fate going forward. In the case, the High Court had said that we are of the view that however the petitioner may be entitled to be declared successful in the course. In the absence of necessary powers under Article, we are unable to grant him any further relief in this petition.
Hearing the matter, the Supreme Court observed that the 1995 Act has now been replaced by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Supreme Court further said that we High Court, however, affirm the view taken by the High Court on issues of law, which came to be determined by the High Court. We do not agree to cancel his candidature because the appellant has completed the course to jeopardize his eligibility.
Also Read: Rajasthan: Rajasthan constable recruitment exam paper also leaked after REET, exam canceled
Netflix News: Netflix profile transfer feature is also available in India, know how to use
Netflix Profile Transfer feature: Netflix has recently launched a new feature called 'Profile Tra
Ranbir Kapoor is in the news for his upcoming film Animal. His first look from the film has alrea
The new X logo replaced the blue bird on Twitter, the dashboard turned black; read all details
Big changes are afoot on Twitter. Elon Musk, the owner of the social media platform Twitter, anno
Every day reshuffle is going on in the corona cases in the country. On the last day i.e. on Wedne
Chennai Super Kings returned to winning ways in the IPL by defeating Kolkata Knight Riders by sev
It is said that if your intentions are good and your courage is high, then one-day success will k
The US has expressed concern over reports claiming that white phosphorus has been used by Israel
Due to the poisonous air, people's breath is again uprooted in Delhi. Here the AQI has reached 44
OMG 2 Trailer Twitter Reaction: People liked the trailer of Akshay Kumar's film, CBFC got ripped off
OMG, 2 Trailer Twitter Reaction: Akshay Kumar and Pankaj Tripathi's film Oh My God 2 is very clos
India's excellent performance continues in the ongoing Asian Games 2023 in Hangzhou, China. India
