New Delhi, Feb 3 (IANS) The central government Tuesday defended section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 saying it was to curb posting of mischievous and objectionable material on social media and websites and in no way could be construed as curbing the fundamental right to free speech and expression.
Describing the contention that section 66A curbed the freedom of speech and expression as "misconceived", Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told a bench of Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman that the said "provision neither intends nor can be interpreted to scuttle freedom of speech and expression of any citizen".
"At the outset, it is clarified that if any provision of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is found to be in conflict with freedom guaranteed under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution of India, the same will have to be read in context of and subject to Article 19(2) of the constitution," he said.
Article 19(1)(a) guarantees freedom of speech and expression while 19(2) says that freedom guaranteed under the former would not affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the state from making any law to impose reasonable restrictions in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.
The government's argument came while opposing the challenge to the validity of section 66A raised by Shreya Singhal who had moved the apex court following the arrest of two girls - Shaheen Dhada and Rinu Shrinivasan - for posting comments critical on Mumbai bandh in the wake of the death of Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray.
Thereafter NGOs Common Cause and PUCL, self-exiled Bangla writer Taslima Nasreen and others also impleaded themselves in the matter.
Section 66A reads: "Any person who sends by any means of a computer resource any information that is grossly offensive or has a menacing character; or any information which he knows to be false, but for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine."
Singhal in her PIL had said that the "phraseology of the aforesaid section is so wide and vague and incapable of being judged on objective standards, that it is susceptible to wanton abuse".
Google Pixel 4a Snapdragon 730 processor can be launched this day, to compete with Oneplus
New Delhi: Pixel 4a, Google's new smartphone is constantly awaited. Now the news is coming that t
On the International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant against Russian President Vladimir Putin
Turkey will provide technical help for the operation of Kabul airport, Taliban appealed
Turkey has accepted the appeal of the Taliban in which Turkey was asked for technical help for th
Taliban leader Mullah Baradar said - there was no intention to kill Ashraf Ghani
Afghan Deputy Prime Minister Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar has said the Taliban had no intention of
Karnataka student murder case: NCPCR president said- such teachers are a danger to students
In the case of a student being lynched by a teacher in Karnataka, the NCPCR president said it is
Union Minister for Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju said that the purpose of passing the Waqf Amendm
Deadpool 3: First look from 'Deadpool 3' surfaced, Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman's cool avatar
Hollywood stars Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman on Monday unveiled the first look at their upcomin
The government has reduced the windfall tax on diesel and ATF (Air Turbine Fuel). According to a
Forgotten joys of homemade gujiyas, Mathhis (Holi is on March 6)
New Delhi, March 3 (IANS) Bhavna Lamba, 28, has fond memories of her mother and grandmother in
Uttar Pradesh is almost certain to get another week for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of t
