The Supreme Court refused to hear a petition challenging the 'VIP' darshan facility in temples in India.
At the same time, the court also refused to issue any direction under Article 32, but said that getting such 'special facility' in temples is arbitrary. Apart from this, the court told the state governments that appropriate action should be taken on this issue if necessary.
What did the bench say?
In fact, during the hearing of a writ petition seeking the abolition of VIP darshan fee levied by temples across the country, the bench of CJI Sanjeev Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, the counsel for the petitioner stressed the need for the states to bring some kind of 'standard operating procedure' for availing darshan in famous temples. He said that giving special facilities to some people is arbitrary and a violation of the principle of equality. Stampede incidents also occur due to the lack of any SOP.
What was the argument given?
He argued that today 12 Jyotirlingas, all Shaktipeeths are following such a practice, it is completely arbitrary. Let the state formulate some kind of SOP. Please make specific prayers regarding the specific issue, he said. However, the bench agreed that special treatment for darshan is arbitrary. The court cannot issue directions under Article 32. It is a policy matter for the consideration of the government.
What else did the Supreme Court say?
The apex court said that we believe that there should be no special treatment with regard to entry into temples, but we do not think that this is a fit case to exercise jurisdiction under Article 32.
The petition said that the practice of providing special or quick 'darshan' in temples under an additional 'VIP' darshan fee is violative of the principle of Articles 14 and 21, as it discriminates against devotees who cannot afford such expenses. Charging an additional fee of up to Rs 400-500 in the temple lacks consideration for ordinary devotees who face many physical and financial constraints.
Vivek Agnihotri's upcoming film 'The Bengal Files', which was in the news even before its release
RJ Mahvash is in the news for her rumored boyfriend, cricketer Yuzvendra Chahal. In such a situat
Delhi AQI: Protest against pollution at India Gate; police detain protesters
People are now taking to the streets to protest against pollution in the capital. On Sunday, peop
LSG star Digvesh Rathi gets a big punishment for 'notebook' celebration, BCCI imposes a hefty fine
Lucknow Super Giants spinner Digvesh Singh Rathi had to pay heavily for doing a 'notebook' celebr
Leader of Opposition in Delhi Assembly Atishi has written a letter to Chief Minister Rekha Gupta
Bigg Boss 19: 'Baklava' is just an excuse Is this the reason why Tanya Mittal visits Dubai?
'You can love her, you can hate her, but you can't ignore her...', this is the condition of Tanya
President Donald Trump has been repeatedly making statements about bringing Greenland under US co
The central government has withdrawn the Z category CRPF security given to Delhi Chief Minister R
Why did Salman Khan call Sonakshi 'Devi', netizens said- 'Bhaijaan', you said...
Sonakshi Sinha, who won everyone's heart by debuting with Salman Khan's film Dabangg, has the sam
The Thackeray brothers have surprised everyone with a major decision in Maharashtra politics. Udd
