Who benefits from the new agricultural laws of the Modi government, who is hurt?


Posted on 8th Dec 2020 04:48 pm by rohit kumar

Farmers are on the road. They are demanding the withdrawal of new agricultural laws. These laws have been made through Parliament, but agitating farmers say that their interests will be affected by these laws.

 

Today, on December 8, to put pressure on the Modi government, many farmer organizations have called 'Bharat Bandh'.

 

A total of 24 political parties have supported this Bharat Bandh of farmers, including the opposition Congress Party. Farmers' organizations say that if the Modi government does not withdraw the agricultural laws, then in the coming time they will get a quarter of the price of their products and the cost of farming will not be realized.

 

Along with this, farmers also fear that the minimum support price ie MSP guaranteed by the government will also end.

 

What is the last in these agricultural laws?

The new agricultural laws aim to change the produce coming in store and for sale in the market.

 

In June, this bill was brought through an ordinance. Later in the Monsoon Session of Parliament, it was passed by voice vote while the opposition parties were against it.

 

According to The Farmers Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation), 2020 law, farmers can sell their produce outside the mandis notified by the APMC i.e. Agriculture Produce Market Committee without paying tax to other states.

 

The second law is - Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Service Act, 2020. According to this, farmers can do contract farming and market it directly.

 

The third law is - Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020. In this, apart from production, storage, sale of grains, pulses, edible oil, onions have been deregulated except in exceptional circumstances.

 

The government argues that with the new law, farmers will get more options and there will be good competition on the price.

 

Besides, private investment in agricultural markets, processing, and infrastructure will be encouraged.

 

Will farmers get minimum support price i.e. MSP?

The biggest fear that has emerged in the farmers' protests is that the MSP system will become irrelevant and they will be forced to sell their produce at a price less than the cost.

 

Under the MSP system, the central government fixes the minimum support price for purchasing the produce of farmers according to the agricultural cost.

 

The government decides the MSP for a total of 23 crops in each season of sowing of crops. However, the central government purchases large quantities of paddy, wheat, and some special pulses.

 

In the year 2015, according to the data of the National Sample Survey by Shanta Kumar Committee, only 6% of farmers can sell their produce at the rate of MSSP. The MSP is not directly affected by these three new laws of the central government.

 

However, most of the government buying centers notified by APMC are in Punjab, Haryana, and some other states.

 

Farmers fear that due to tax-free business outside the APMC mandi, government purchases will be affected and gradually this system will become irrelevant.

 

Farmers demand that the MSP be made compulsory from the government market to the private market so that all types of buyers - whether government or private, do not buy food below this rate.

 

Why is the minimum support price necessary in government purchases?

The largest part of the product that the government buys comes from Punjab and Haryana. If we look at the data of the last five years, the government, whether it is wheat or rice, has bought the most from Punjab and Haryana. On this, the Indian government spends billions of rupees.

 

It has been considered as one of the world's most expensive 'Government Food Buying Programs'.

 

After calculating the cost of cultivation, the State Government-run Agricultural Costs and Prices Commission (CACP) announces the Minimum Support Price (MSP) of more than 22 crops to set a benchmark.

 

Although the CACP announces the MSP for most crops every year, the state-run grain buying agencies and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buy only rice and wheat at those prices, due to lack of storage and funding.

 

After purchasing rice and wheat from farmers on MSP, FCI can sell ration to the poor at concessional prices and the government compensates for the loss of FCI.

 

The 'Guaranteed Price' from FCI encourages farmers to produce rice and wheat in large quantities. But it also puts pressure on the overproduction FCI to buy additional supplies from farmers, resulting in frequent abundance of food grains in state warehouses. Also, the subsidy bill that is made on it often increases the budget deficit.

 

Despite the huge reserves of rice and wheat, exporting them has been a major challenge for FCI. In such a situation, the cost of storage and the increasing MSP every year makes the cost of wheat and rice more expensive for FCI, so that foreign sales do not remain profitable.

 

Sometimes, the Indian government keeps sending small amounts of rice and wheat to other countries through diplomatic deals. Nevertheless, FCI godowns remain full.

 

The 'price guarantee' provided to the farmers by the FCI model is the biggest benefit to the big farmers in Punjab and Haryana, while the small farmers of Bihar and other states are not able to get this benefit.

 

Punjab and Haryana, why most aggressive about these laws?

85 percent of wheat and rice in Punjab and about 75 percent of wheat and rice in Haryana are purchased on MSP. For this reason, the farmers of these states fear that their situation will deteriorate if the MSP system ends.

 

Farmers of these states also fear that the market price of their crops will fall without MSP.

 

Most investment has been done on the APMC system in these states and these mandis are the most developed in these states. They are fine network is built there. It is a systematic system through which farmers can sell their crops. But farmers fear that the new laws will affect them.

 

Every year, farmers in Punjab and Haryana can sell almost their entire production to the FCI at a minimum support price through a well-developed mandi system, whereas farmers in Bihar and other states are unable to do so because there is no such developed mandi system.

 

Also, unlike the poor farmers of Bihar - the rich and politically influential peasant communities of Punjab and Haryana ensure that the FCI continues to purchase the largest quantities of rice and wheat from their states.

 

As reported by the news agency Reuters, while Punjab and Haryana can sell almost their entire production (rice and wheat) to FCI, the total purchases by government agencies in Bihar is less than two percent. For this reason, most farmers of Bihar are forced to sell their produce at a discount of 20-30 percent.

 

Already deprived of 'assured income', the farmers of Bihar have not opposed the new laws. While farmers in Punjab and Haryana fear that their situation may not be the same as farmers in Bihar and other states, they want the FCI model to remain in place and the system of purchasing their produce at the minimum support price. Otherwise, if this system changes, then they too will be forced to face private buyers.

 

What are the other concerns?

 

State governments are worried about the possibility of a decline in market tax. Non-BJP ruled states have stated openly that they will incur tax losses with these laws. Mandi tax in various states of India ranges from 1 to 8.5 percent, which goes to the account of the state governments.

 

Some financial matters experts and activists say that Punjab and Rajasthan are also considering bringing the law related to it.

 

There are seven thousand APMC markets in India and most of the purchase of agricultural production takes place outside the mandis. Bihar, Kerala, and Manipur have not implemented the APMC system.

 

There is also a lot of concern about the permission of crop stock. It is believed that it will bring the necessary investment in agriculture, but small farmers will benefit from it, it is less likely because they will not be in a position to negotiate with big investors.

1 Like 0 Dislike
Previous news Next news
Other news

Sanatan Dharma: An attempt was made to insult Sanatan Dharma, Rahul Gandhi and Uddhav Thackeray are sitting silent - Anurag Thakur

Union Minister Anurag Thakur on Monday (September 11) once again cornered the opposition over the

Wheat Crop: Threat of rising heat looms over wheat production in India! This preparation of the government before the trouble increases

India has set up a panel of officials to assess the impact of rising temperatures on the wheat cr

Rajasthan MLA is running Punjab government with minister's bungalow, Captain Amarinder attacks Harish Chaudhary

Former Punjab Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Singh today dismissed as baseless allegations made

Rahul Gandhi: Two months have passed since Lok Sabha membership was restored, but Rahul has not yet returned to his bungalow, what is the reason?

More than two months have passed since Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's Parliament membership was reins

Board Exams: Supreme Court will hear on the petition to cancel the offline examinations of class 10th and 12th board

The Supreme Court has approved the hearing on the petition to cancel the offline examinations of

Coal India: Adequate supply of fuel to power plants, first tender issued for coal import

State-owned CIL on Thursday said it has floated its first tender for the import of 2.416 million

Ranbir Alia Wedding: 'Naagin 6' fame Tejashwi Prakash got angry with the paparazzi on the question of Ranbir's marriage to Neetu Kapoor, threatened him!

Wherever you look, only the wedding ring of Ranbir Kapoor and Alia Bhatt remains. The talk of the

UP PET 2022: UP PET exam started, if you are joining then know the important rules

UP PET 2022: Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Services Selection Commission (UPSSSC) is going to conduct

WC Qualifiers 2023: Zimbabwe recorded the second-biggest win in ODI cricket history, and Team India is still king

In the 17th match of the ICC World Cup Qualifier, Zimbabwe crushed America by 304 runs. In respon

The British PM said - I suffered apartheid: Sunak said - I will not let the same discrimination happen to anyone

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has broken his silence on the allegations of apartheid in Buck

Sign up to write
Sign up now if you have flare of writing..
Login   |   Register
Follow Us
Indyaspeak @ Facebook Indyaspeak @ Twitter Indyaspeak @ Pinterest RSS



Play Free Quiz and Win Cash