Guixt issue

Posted on 16th Feb 2014 07:03 pm by admin

Hello all,

We are experiencing the following problem with Guixt:

Some transactions such like VA02, vA42,.. are "enhanced" using Guixt.
When the scripts are tested by our developers, no problem occur. The
scripts are read from the Sap Web Repository and are running well.

When these scripts are used more intensively by end-users, from time
to time, the scripts are not excuted anymore leaving the standard Sap
screen. The end-user has then to leave his sap sessions, sometimes a
reboot is necessary.

Does anybody have an idea of what is going wrong ?

Here are some version informations:

Sap ECC6
Sapgui 620 (Patch level 77)
Guixt 2009 Q3 3
Windows Xp

Your Answer:

Login to answer

Other forums

TinyMCE / Ajax Postback Problem
Hiya all,

I have a page which loads the TinyMCE editor. On the postback I obviously want to f

cURL Upload Help
OK, I am creating a bridge from a local program to my website and I am trying to find the best way t

An odd assignment statement. Can someone explain this assignment to me?
What purpose is served by the bit of code between the two equal signs in the $installurl set? Is th

Mouseover to edit (Ajax)
hi friends, can anyone help with the code behind to get this application working, please in VB (new

help with multi-update
Now sure how to ask this really....
10g database if that matters.

I have a customer

Multi image upload
I have a gallery to build and want to build a dynamic upload form to allow for $var number of fields

php mailer
How can i send a mail to large no, say 50,000 reciepients using [color=#0000FF]php mailer[/color]

comparing tables across databases sql refinement ideas required
Hi all

Via pl/sql I need to ensure that data between tables in different databases match

Somebody hacked into my site and changed coding >>> URGENT HELP NEEDED <<<
I am not that much into programming , but somebody is hacking to my site and injecting some kind of

Socket problem
Hello,

Earlier I posted about my problem with my socket script. It took up to 100% CPU usage.