FAGL_FC_TRANSLATION FAS52 New GL ECC 6.0

Posted on 16th Feb 2014 07:03 pm by admin

Hello,

The new program for Translating GL Balances (FAS 52) gives the option to use different exchange rate types for balance sheet and P&L accounts, however unlike the old program, it does not let us take the adjustment to
the original account. This is due to the fact that the configuration for translation is at the FS item level instead of the individual account level. US GAAP requires the translation balances to be booked back to the
individual accounts instead of the adjustment accounts.

I can use the FAGL_FC_VAL program to translate at the individual account by using valuation area but this program does not give the option to book different exchange rate types for balance sheet and P&L account.

Any pointers or advise on this issue is highly appreciated.
Thanks

Your Answer:

Login to answer

Other forums

A WBS element with the name XXX already exists in version FREI_VERSION
Hi.
When I am trying to insert WBS element in a project, error occurs:

"A WBS eleme

Help with PHP Email Script
Hi guys,

I'm a newbie to php and need help with the script below:

At the moment when I

SQL query not working well
Hi,
I made a small table with 5 rows and want to make them an sql consult using rownum

Help With editting and deleting form
Hallo !!

So look at this image :

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/8272/snapshot5f.pn

PHP switch function help
Hi, I am trying to create a search function for a directory website. On the search function on html

CHMOD script
Hi,

I need a script to read all files in a folder and set to 777.

Can anyone help out

Match stored value with the current value in a loop
Hello,

I have a MySQL db were I store articles in.

I have a form to fill these article

Phase Error I can't seem to find :(`
Hey guys, I can seem to find my phase error on this. I am getting this error

[error]
Pars

How can I get my program to read a larger array ??
Hi:

I have this program that reads from an array to do calculations. The array are just t

Request for tunning the below query
Hi,

Can any one help me on the below query while improving the performance,