Ban on filing a new FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin, the case is related to his comment on Sanatan Dharma.


Posted on 7th Mar 2025 10:48 am by rohit kumar

The Supreme Court on Thursday banned the registration of any new FIR against Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin in the controversial remarks on Sanatan Dharma. While hearing Stalin's petition seeking to combine the cases registered in different parts of the country and hear them in one place, the court ordered that no new FIR be registered without the court's permission.

 

The court has also continued the interim order of exemption to Stalin from appearing in the court. However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Maharashtra government, strongly opposed the ban on filing FIRs, calling Udhayanidhi's statement irresponsible. He said that Stalin had made a statement about ending Sanatan Dharma, just because the community which is being talked about ending does not react violently, it cannot be said so.

 

Did you know?Explore Trending and Topic pages for more stories like this.

What statement did Stalin give?

 

Udhayanidhi Stalin had said in a program in September 2023 that just like dengue mosquitoes, malaria, and corona need to be eradicated, Sanatan Dharma will also have to be eradicated. Cases have been registered against Udhayanidhi in different parts of the country for this statement. Stalin demanded that all the cases be combined and heard.

 

The court banned the registration of new FIRs.

 

On Thursday, a bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar heard Udhayanidhi's petition. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Stalin, said that the cases registered against Udhayanidhi Stalin should be combined and sent for hearing in Karnataka instead of Tamil Nadu. But the Solicitor General opposed it. But the court issued notice to the respondents in the newly added cases and banned the registration of any new FIR without the permission of the court.

 

The case will be heard again in April.

The case will be heard again in April. Opposing the ban on filing a new FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, said that if a leader from any other state had talked about eliminating any other religion, it would have created trouble. He said that just because the community which is being talked about eliminating does not react violently, it cannot be said so. But the court said that it will not comment on this because it will affect the case.

 

What else did the bench say?

 

The bench said that it is not considering the merit of the case, so arguments should not be given on it. Referring to the case pending in another bench regarding hate speech, Mehta told the court that that case should also be attached to this so that all religions are treated equally. Mehta said that in that case, the court has ordered to register a case. But the court did not agree to this.

 

Mehta was referring to the writ petition of Shaheen Abdullah which is pending before another bench. In that case, the court had asked the police to take precautionary measures like videography etc. on the apprehension of hate speech by a Hindu leader. In that case, the court had also given instructions to register an FIR.

1 Like 0 Dislike
Previous news Next news
Other news

Gold & Silver Prices Today: Gold Holds at ₹1.41 Lakh, Silver Falls ₹3,500 on First Day of the Month

Gold and silver prices witnessed fresh weakness on the first trading day of July as global and do

Will there be artificial rain in Delhi today? AQI exceeds 300... 'Toxic' air suffocates Delhi-NCR.

The air in Delhi-NCR has remained toxic since Diwali. Due to the pollution levels, GRAP-2 restric

India-US Tension: 'We will buy those things which India has made with its sweat'; PM Modi's important message from Kashi

The people of the country should take a pledge of Swadeshi. We will buy those things that India h

'Modi ji himself brought a bill against himself... Shah spoke on the bill for dismissal of PM-CM; he took a jibe at the opposition

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has said that the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, will d

Mamata Banerjee was making a strategy with her nephew for change in TMC The 'script' failed in the 12-minute online meeting

A major change is being seen in West Bengal's ruling party, Trinamool Congress (TMC), before the

Rajpal Yadav Case: Will Rs 9 crore be forgiven after serving his sentence, or will the actor have to pay double the amount?

Bollywood actor-comedian Rajpal Yadav is currently serving his sentence in Tihar Jail in a debt c

Hera Pheri 3: Suniel Shetty spoke on Paresh Rawal's return in 'Hera Pheri 3', said- 'Fine-tuning has been done...'

The audience is eagerly waiting for 'Hera Pheri 3'. The film has been in constant discussion for

New Year 2026 Celebration: Traffic changes expected today in Noida Sector-18 and surrounding areas; the traffic police have issue an advisory.

A large number of people are expected to head to restaurants, bars, and markets from Wednesday ev

Tripura Student Death: 'We are all Indians, ensure equal treatment...', pleads the father of deceased Angel Chakma to the government.

In Dehradun, the capital of Uttarakhand, following the death of Angel Chakma, a student from Trip

Cannes 2025: Aishwarya Rai stole the show in a white Banarasi saree with vermilion, users called her the OG Queen of Cannes

Every year, fans eagerly wait for Aishwarya Rai Bachchan to appear on the red carpet of the Canne

Sign up to write
Sign up now if you have flare of writing..
Login   |   Register
Follow Us
Indyaspeak @ Facebook Indyaspeak @ Twitter Indyaspeak @ Pinterest RSS



Play Free Quiz and Win Cash