The Supreme Court on Thursday banned the registration of any new FIR against Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin in the controversial remarks on Sanatan Dharma. While hearing Stalin's petition seeking to combine the cases registered in different parts of the country and hear them in one place, the court ordered that no new FIR be registered without the court's permission.
The court has also continued the interim order of exemption to Stalin from appearing in the court. However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Maharashtra government, strongly opposed the ban on filing FIRs, calling Udhayanidhi's statement irresponsible. He said that Stalin had made a statement about ending Sanatan Dharma, just because the community which is being talked about ending does not react violently, it cannot be said so.
What statement did Stalin give?
Udhayanidhi Stalin had said in a program in September 2023 that just like dengue mosquitoes, malaria, and corona need to be eradicated, Sanatan Dharma will also have to be eradicated. Cases have been registered against Udhayanidhi in different parts of the country for this statement. Stalin demanded that all the cases be combined and heard.
The court banned the registration of new FIRs.
On Thursday, a bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar heard Udhayanidhi's petition. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Stalin, said that the cases registered against Udhayanidhi Stalin should be combined and sent for hearing in Karnataka instead of Tamil Nadu. But the Solicitor General opposed it. But the court issued notice to the respondents in the newly added cases and banned the registration of any new FIR without the permission of the court.
The case will be heard again in April.
The case will be heard again in April. Opposing the ban on filing a new FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, said that if a leader from any other state had talked about eliminating any other religion, it would have created trouble. He said that just because the community which is being talked about eliminating does not react violently, it cannot be said so. But the court said that it will not comment on this because it will affect the case.
What else did the bench say?
The bench said that it is not considering the merit of the case, so arguments should not be given on it. Referring to the case pending in another bench regarding hate speech, Mehta told the court that that case should also be attached to this so that all religions are treated equally. Mehta said that in that case, the court has ordered to register a case. But the court did not agree to this.
Mehta was referring to the writ petition of Shaheen Abdullah which is pending before another bench. In that case, the court had asked the police to take precautionary measures like videography etc. on the apprehension of hate speech by a Hindu leader. In that case, the court had also given instructions to register an FIR.
The Prime Minister has arrived on his two-day visit to Japan. Here, he will participate in the 15
Very sad news is coming from the film industry right now. Renowned actor Pankaj Dheer has passed
US President Donald Trump has made a shocking announcement. He said that the US has signed a majo
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath assured that people of all religions are safe in the
Punjab Kings and RCB are to face each other in the final of IPL 2025. Meanwhile, radio jockey tur
South Industry's well-known actor Vijay Deverakonda is once again in the headlines for his person
'This is Modi's war...', US connects India with Russia-Ukraine war amid tariff war
Hours after US President Donald Trump imposed a massive 50 per cent tariff on India, his trade ad
Rajasthan Royals' young opener Vaibhav Suryavanshi touched Mahendra Singh Dhoni's feet and conclu
Bigg Boss 19: This TV actress got an invitation to Salman Khan's show, will she enter season 19?
Everyone is eagerly waiting for the controversial show Bigg Boss 19 on the small screen. Every da
Sapna's daughter's marriage was fixed with Rahul, whose marriage procession was to come on 16th A
