
The Supreme Court on Thursday banned the registration of any new FIR against Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin in the controversial remarks on Sanatan Dharma. While hearing Stalin's petition seeking to combine the cases registered in different parts of the country and hear them in one place, the court ordered that no new FIR be registered without the court's permission.
The court has also continued the interim order of exemption to Stalin from appearing in the court. However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Maharashtra government, strongly opposed the ban on filing FIRs, calling Udhayanidhi's statement irresponsible. He said that Stalin had made a statement about ending Sanatan Dharma, just because the community which is being talked about ending does not react violently, it cannot be said so.
What statement did Stalin give?
Udhayanidhi Stalin had said in a program in September 2023 that just like dengue mosquitoes, malaria, and corona need to be eradicated, Sanatan Dharma will also have to be eradicated. Cases have been registered against Udhayanidhi in different parts of the country for this statement. Stalin demanded that all the cases be combined and heard.
The court banned the registration of new FIRs.
On Thursday, a bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar heard Udhayanidhi's petition. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Stalin, said that the cases registered against Udhayanidhi Stalin should be combined and sent for hearing in Karnataka instead of Tamil Nadu. But the Solicitor General opposed it. But the court issued notice to the respondents in the newly added cases and banned the registration of any new FIR without the permission of the court.
The case will be heard again in April.
The case will be heard again in April. Opposing the ban on filing a new FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, said that if a leader from any other state had talked about eliminating any other religion, it would have created trouble. He said that just because the community which is being talked about eliminating does not react violently, it cannot be said so. But the court said that it will not comment on this because it will affect the case.
What else did the bench say?
The bench said that it is not considering the merit of the case, so arguments should not be given on it. Referring to the case pending in another bench regarding hate speech, Mehta told the court that that case should also be attached to this so that all religions are treated equally. Mehta said that in that case, the court has ordered to register a case. But the court did not agree to this.
Mehta was referring to the writ petition of Shaheen Abdullah which is pending before another bench. In that case, the court had asked the police to take precautionary measures like videography etc. on the apprehension of hate speech by a Hindu leader. In that case, the court had also given instructions to register an FIR.
Who will benefit from the India-US trade deal and how much? White House releases fact sheet
The Trump administration has described the India-US trade deal as historic. The White House says
The case of Raja Raghuvanshi's death in Shillong, Meghalaya remains in the headlines. Raja Raghuv
Famous cricketer Shikhar Dhawan is set to tie the knot for the second time. He is going to marry
After the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on 22 April, the Indian Army destroyed the terrorist hideo
Akshaye Khanna played the role of the dacoit Rehman in the movie Dhurandhar. As soon as the film
Will there be artificial rain in Delhi today? AQI exceeds 300... 'Toxic' air suffocates Delhi-NCR.
The air in Delhi-NCR has remained toxic since Diwali. Due to the pollution levels, GRAP-2 restric
The court has delivered its verdict on five serious charges against former Bangladesh Prime Minis
As temperatures continue to soar across India, air conditioners have become an essential applianc
The Deol family is going through one of the most emotional moments of their lives. Dharmendra, a
The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has suspended the No Objection Certificates (NOCs) of its player