Ban on filing a new FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin, the case is related to his comment on Sanatan Dharma.


Posted on 7th Mar 2025 10:48 am by rohit kumar

The Supreme Court on Thursday banned the registration of any new FIR against Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin in the controversial remarks on Sanatan Dharma. While hearing Stalin's petition seeking to combine the cases registered in different parts of the country and hear them in one place, the court ordered that no new FIR be registered without the court's permission.

 

The court has also continued the interim order of exemption to Stalin from appearing in the court. However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Maharashtra government, strongly opposed the ban on filing FIRs, calling Udhayanidhi's statement irresponsible. He said that Stalin had made a statement about ending Sanatan Dharma, just because the community which is being talked about ending does not react violently, it cannot be said so.

 

What statement did Stalin give?

 

Udhayanidhi Stalin had said in a program in September 2023 that just like dengue mosquitoes, malaria, and corona need to be eradicated, Sanatan Dharma will also have to be eradicated. Cases have been registered against Udhayanidhi in different parts of the country for this statement. Stalin demanded that all the cases be combined and heard.

 

The court banned the registration of new FIRs.

 

On Thursday, a bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar heard Udhayanidhi's petition. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Stalin, said that the cases registered against Udhayanidhi Stalin should be combined and sent for hearing in Karnataka instead of Tamil Nadu. But the Solicitor General opposed it. But the court issued notice to the respondents in the newly added cases and banned the registration of any new FIR without the permission of the court.

 

The case will be heard again in April.

The case will be heard again in April. Opposing the ban on filing a new FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, said that if a leader from any other state had talked about eliminating any other religion, it would have created trouble. He said that just because the community which is being talked about eliminating does not react violently, it cannot be said so. But the court said that it will not comment on this because it will affect the case.

 

What else did the bench say?

 

The bench said that it is not considering the merit of the case, so arguments should not be given on it. Referring to the case pending in another bench regarding hate speech, Mehta told the court that that case should also be attached to this so that all religions are treated equally. Mehta said that in that case, the court has ordered to register a case. But the court did not agree to this.

 

Mehta was referring to the writ petition of Shaheen Abdullah which is pending before another bench. In that case, the court had asked the police to take precautionary measures like videography etc. on the apprehension of hate speech by a Hindu leader. In that case, the court had also given instructions to register an FIR.

1 Like 0 Dislike
Previous news Next news
Other news

Ban on TikTok continues in India, the Government said- no order has been issued to unblock the app

The government has not issued any order to unblock the Chinese internet media platform TikTok. Af

After The Traitors, will Arjun Kapoor's sister be imprisoned in the Bigg Boss 19 house? Said this about Salman's show

Boney Kapoor's daughter and Arjun Kapoor's sister, Anshula Kapoor, is one of the famous star kids

IND vs PAK: 'Shaking hands is just a tradition, not a rule', BCCI stands with the team on the handshake controversy; A befitting reply to Pakistan

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has finally issued a statement on the 'handshake

Sambhal Violence: Alert after arrest of Masjid Committee chief, police increased security

The police were completely alert regarding the arrest of Jama Masjid Committee's Sadar Zafar Ali.

Mahieka Sharma: Who is Mahieka Sharma? Her name is being linked with Hardik Pandya; She has worked with Vivek Oberoi

Indian star cricketer Hardik Pandya is once again in the headlines these days. Apart from his uni

SRH vs LSG Playing-11: What will happen to Lucknow today? Will face Hyderabad with a weak bowling attack, probable-11

Sunrisers Hyderabad will face Lucknow Super Giants in the seventh match of IPL 2025 today. This m

Himani Murder Case: Police arrested the accused in the Himani murder case, mother alleges that Congress people were involved in the murder

Haryana Police has arrested an accused in the murder case of Congress worker Himani Narwal. Polic

Dhami government's action against illegal madrasas continues in Uttarakhand, three madrasas sealed in Kaladhungi.

Action is being taken against illegal madrasas and encroachment in the state. On Monday, the admi

Sanchar Saathi: 'Sanchar Saathi' made mandatory again; learn how other democratic countries handle their cybersecurity?

The Indian government had instructed all phone companies that all new smartphones launched in the

IND vs ENG: Rishabh Pant scores at an average of 52 in the fourth innings, Jadeja-Sundar and Nitish's statistics are scary

All-rounder Washington Sundar took four wickets to put India in a great position on the fourth da

Sign up to write
Sign up now if you have flare of writing..
Login   |   Register
Follow Us
Indyaspeak @ Facebook Indyaspeak @ Twitter Indyaspeak @ Pinterest RSS



Play Free Quiz and Win Cash