Ban on filing a new FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin, the case is related to his comment on Sanatan Dharma.


Posted on 7th Mar 2025 10:48 am by rohit kumar

The Supreme Court on Thursday banned the registration of any new FIR against Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin in the controversial remarks on Sanatan Dharma. While hearing Stalin's petition seeking to combine the cases registered in different parts of the country and hear them in one place, the court ordered that no new FIR be registered without the court's permission.

 

The court has also continued the interim order of exemption to Stalin from appearing in the court. However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Maharashtra government, strongly opposed the ban on filing FIRs, calling Udhayanidhi's statement irresponsible. He said that Stalin had made a statement about ending Sanatan Dharma, just because the community which is being talked about ending does not react violently, it cannot be said so.

 

Did you know?Explore Trending and Topic pages for more stories like this.

What statement did Stalin give?

 

Udhayanidhi Stalin had said in a program in September 2023 that just like dengue mosquitoes, malaria, and corona need to be eradicated, Sanatan Dharma will also have to be eradicated. Cases have been registered against Udhayanidhi in different parts of the country for this statement. Stalin demanded that all the cases be combined and heard.

 

The court banned the registration of new FIRs.

 

On Thursday, a bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar heard Udhayanidhi's petition. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Stalin, said that the cases registered against Udhayanidhi Stalin should be combined and sent for hearing in Karnataka instead of Tamil Nadu. But the Solicitor General opposed it. But the court issued notice to the respondents in the newly added cases and banned the registration of any new FIR without the permission of the court.

 

The case will be heard again in April.

The case will be heard again in April. Opposing the ban on filing a new FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, said that if a leader from any other state had talked about eliminating any other religion, it would have created trouble. He said that just because the community which is being talked about eliminating does not react violently, it cannot be said so. But the court said that it will not comment on this because it will affect the case.

 

What else did the bench say?

 

The bench said that it is not considering the merit of the case, so arguments should not be given on it. Referring to the case pending in another bench regarding hate speech, Mehta told the court that that case should also be attached to this so that all religions are treated equally. Mehta said that in that case, the court has ordered to register a case. But the court did not agree to this.

 

Mehta was referring to the writ petition of Shaheen Abdullah which is pending before another bench. In that case, the court had asked the police to take precautionary measures like videography etc. on the apprehension of hate speech by a Hindu leader. In that case, the court had also given instructions to register an FIR.

1 Like 0 Dislike
Previous news Next news
Other news

Diljit Dosanjh: Abhijeet Bhattacharya got angry at Diljit amidst the controversy of Sardar Ji 3, said- India belongs to our father

Punjabi superstar and singer Diljit Dosanjh is once again in the headlines, although now he is su

Trump Tariff: Trump's tariffs hurt the US economy, decision to return to Reciprocal Tariff will be difficult

The fear of Reciprocal Tariff is still a little uncertain but comparatively seems to be calming d

Radical Videos, Attacks on Guards, and a Map of Mumbai... Who is the 'Lone Wolf'? A Major Plot Exposed.

A major revelation has emerged regarding the accused individual who attacked two security guards

Narendra Modi: From the vaccination drive to the Vishwanath temple worship… where and how did PM Modi celebrate his birthday in the past 11 years?

The Prime Minister of the country, Narendra Modi, will celebrate his 75th birthday today, i.e., o

Politics on Vice President's resignation: Government was uncomfortable with Jagdeep Dhankhar's hyperactivity, but there was no hint of resignation

The government was uncomfortable with the overactivity of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar on the

Bihar Election Results 2025: Where will the money come from to fulfill the promises of the manifesto, will the NDA government withdraw prohibition?

With the results of the 2025 Bihar Assembly Elections coming out, the state's Finance Department

IND vs ENG: India has not found Pujara's replacement yet, after Karun, Sudarshan also failed at number three, scoring 140 runs

The fifth and final match of the five-match Test series between India and England is being played

'Stop the 10-minute delivery option', Gig workers on strike today; what are their demands?

The countdown to the New Year has begun. In a few hours, the entire world will be celebrating the

Beware, Delhi parents! 5,559 children have gone missing in the capital in the last 11 years, and 695 of them are still untraced.

Human trafficking is also becoming a major problem in the capital. According to Delhi Police's Zi

Be alert if the network suddenly disappears from your phone! It could be a SIM swap fraud; here’s how to stay safe.

A sudden loss of mobile network is often dismissed as a routine telecom issue. However, cybersecu

Sign up to write
Sign up now if you have flare of writing..
Login   |   Register
Follow Us
Indyaspeak @ Facebook Indyaspeak @ Twitter Indyaspeak @ Pinterest RSS



Play Free Quiz and Win Cash