The survey report on the Gyanvapi controversy was presented on Monday. Both sides took their points in turn. The hearing lasted for about 45 minutes in the court of District Judge Dr. Ajay Krishna Vishwesh. The verdict will be pronounced on Tuesday. During this, 19 lawyers from both sides and four petitioners were present in the courtroom.
The survey report related to Gyanvapi was submitted to the court on Saturday itself. However, the Supreme Court had earlier stayed the verdict. However, later allowed. Along with this, the matter was ordered to be transferred from the Sessions Court to the District Court. Ajay Mishra, who was the court commissioner, was stopped from going to the courtroom. It is being told that due to the lack of name on the list, he was not allowed inside. Tight security arrangements have been made for the hearing in the district court. A large number of soldiers are stationed outside. Do not crowd during the hearing. This has also been taken care of.
A court hearing on these issues
In the Gyanvapi complex, the case filed for allowing daily worship of Goddess Shringar Gauri and preserving other gods and goddesses will be heard.
On the survey report of Gyanvapi submitted by the Advocate Commissioner, the court can initiate a debate or give a decision.
The court will also decide whether the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 is applicable in the Gyanvapi case. i.e. here, the right of worship may or may not be given.
The hearing will be held on the application of DGC Civil and the objection of the Anjuman Inazaniya Masajid Committee. DGC Civil has filed a counter objection.
At the same time, before the hearing in the court, Abhaynath, the lawyer for the Muslim side, had given a big statement. He said that the court should first decide whether this case is even worth running or not.
Mahant of Vishwanath temple will also file a petition
Former Mahant of Kashi Vishwanath temple, Dr. VC Tiwari had reached the district judge's court on Monday to file a petition. He said that he should be given the right to bathe, indulge in raga, make-up, and worship the Shivling found in the Gyanvapi complex. He said that we have come to demand the right to worship our Lord Vishweshwar judicially.
Places of Worship Act 1991 does not apply: Advocate for the Hindu side
Vishnu Jain, counsel for the Hindu side, submitted that the Places of Worship Act, 1991 is not applicable in the case of Gyanvapi Masjid. He said that in the case of Din Mohammad in 1937, 15 people had testified that there was worship there which took place till 1942. Therefore, that act will not be effective in the Gyanvapi case. We will also place the same fact before the court.
Hindu Sena and BJP leaders will also file a petition
Hindu Sena national president Vishnu Gupta will file a petition in the Varanasi court regarding the Gyanvapi case. Vishnu Gupta had also applied to the Supreme Court to make himself a plaintiff in the Gyanvapi case.
On the other hand, in the Gyanvapi case, another petition has been filed in the Supreme Court on Monday. It has been filed by BJP leader and advocates Ashwani Upadhyay. He has demanded dismissal of the application of the Masjid Committee. It has been said that the mosque built by destroying the temple is not valid, it is an Islamic principle.
District Judge has 8 weeks to complete the hearing
On May 20, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court transferred the Gyanvapi case to the Varanasi district judge's court. The bench of Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice Surya Kant and Justice PS Narasimha had clearly said in the 51-minute hearing that the matter is definitely with us, but first, it should be heard in the Varanasi District Court.
The court said that the district judge will complete his hearing in 8 weeks. Till then the directions given during the hearing on May 17 will continue. After the order of the Supreme Court, on May 21, the letter related to the Gyanvapi case from the court of Civil Judge Senior Division Ravi Kumar Diwakar was transferred to the court of the District Judge. Let us tell you that on May 17, the Supreme Court had said three big things in its order.
First- The place claiming to be Shivling should be secured.
Second- Muslims should not be stopped from offering Namaz.
Third- The order to offer Namaz to only 20 people is no longer applicable. That is, these three instructions will be applicable for the next 8 weeks. There will be no change in this.
Covid-19: Did corona infection originate in China, WHO asked for data for investigation
World Health Organization (WHO) chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has asked China to share data re
Now protests in at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, and students protesting will have to
Rahul Gandhi's Birthday: When Rahul Gandhi had to face two biggest tragedies in his life
Happy Birthday Rahul Gandhi: Today is the birthday of Rahul Gandhi, son of late Prime Minister Ra
Voting is being held at all polling stations for Delhi Vidhan Sabha Chunav 2025 from the schedule
Heart Attack In Winters: Why do heart attack cases increase in cold weather as compared to summer?
Heart Attack In Winters: A heart attack occurs when the blood supply to the heart is suddenly int
Fierce fighting broke out in eastern Ukraine, Russian army shot down a Ukrainian drone near Crimea
The Russian military has stepped up attacks on cities in eastern Ukraine. On Thursday, there was
Yesterday on Thursday, actress Aarti Singh married Deepak Chauhan with full r
Pakistani security forces killed 25 out of 35 terrorists, two commandos also died
Pakistan's security forces killed 25 out of 35 Islamist terrorists hiding in an anti-terrorist ce
Animal Song Papa Meri Jaan: Ranbir Kapoor and Rashmika Mandanna's 'Animal' is releasing on the fi
Indian team's star batsman Virat Kohli and his wife Anushka Sharma have recently become parents f
