
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court declined to hear a petition filed against a Ministry of Home Affairs circular regarding the singing of the national song, 'Vande Mataram,' at official events and in schools, stating that the directive is not mandatory.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi termed the petition, filed by Mohammed Saeed Noori, as premature and characterized it as being based on vague apprehensions of discrimination. The Court observed that if any punitive action is taken or a notice is issued, the petitioner may then approach the Court.
Representing Noori, Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde submitted that while they respect all religions, if people are compelled to sing this song irrespective of their religious beliefs and faith, some individuals may perceive it as coercion.
Justice Bagchi remarked to Hegde, "It simply appears to us that you harbor certain vague apprehensions regarding discrimination, which bear no clear nexus to the circular in question." He further inquired whether the circular stipulated any punitive consequences for not singing the national song, or if any individual had been expelled from an assembly for refusing to sing it.
Hegde responded, "There is a provision for punishment in the event of a disruption... Even in the absence of a formal legal penalty, anyone who refuses to sing the song—or declines to stand while it is being sung—invariably faces immense social pressure."
"Can people be compelled to sing this song under the guise of a mere advisory?" In response to this query, the Chief Justice asked Hegde whether the petitioner had received any notice compelling him or anyone else to sing the national song.
Justice Bagchi observed, "The Central Government's directive uses the phrase 'may be sung.' The liberty to refrain from singing the national song is just as valid as the liberty to sing it."
The Bench informed the petitioner that he could approach the Court should any punitive action be initiated against him or if he were to receive any formal notice. The Bench concluded that, at present, the petition amounts to nothing more than "vague apprehensions of discrimination."
RR vs CSK: Vaibhav Goes on the Attack—Rajasthan Crushes CSK to Record Their Biggest Victory
Indian cricket’s young sensation, Vaibhav Suryavanshi, unleashed such a batting onslaught a
Want ₹5 Crore Wealth? This SIP Formula Shows How ₹30,000 Per Month Can Get You There
Building long-term wealth does not always require a huge initial investment. Financial experts be
The results for the Uttar Pradesh Board’s Class 10 and 12 examinations are set to be declar
Will a Lockdown Be Imposed in India? Union Minister Clarifies; Also Issues Statement on Excise Duty.
On Friday, the government dismissed rumors of a potential nationwide lockdown amidst the ongoing
On Saturday, in IPL 2026, two of the most successful teams in the history of the tournament will
In a major blow to its Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha on Thursday, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) remove
AC Cooling Hack Goes Viral: Should You Pour Water on the Outdoor Unit? Experts Reveal the Truth
As temperatures continue to soar across the country, air conditioners have become an essential pa
On Monday, severe storms—accompanied by heavy rain, hailstorms, and lightning strikes&mdash
Amidst a shortage of LPG cylinders, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) has introduced a
Residents across Delhi-NCR received much-needed relief from intense heat and humidity on Monday a