More than 70 petitions filed against the Waqf Law were heard in the Supreme Court on Wednesday. The matter was debated for about two hours. The matter will be heard today i.e. on Thursday as well.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, along with other petitioners' lawyers, presented their arguments in the court on Wednesday. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was present in the court on behalf of the government.
During the hearing, the petitioners who filed the petition against the Waqf Law presented their arguments, while the central government also presented its side in defense of the law.
During this, the Supreme Court also asked sharp questions to the central government regarding the Waqf Law. It is worth noting that the Supreme Court's comment on the Waqf Law has increased the difficulties of the central government.
The first issue on which the Supreme Court expressed concern is 'Waqf by User'.
During the hearing on Wednesday, Abhishek Manu Singhvi was constantly referring to the 'Waqf by User' property. Abhishek Manu Singhvi argued in the court that there are 8 lakh Waqf properties across the country, out of which half i.e. more than 4 lakh properties are registered as 'Waqf by User'. Singhvi further argued and expressed concern that after the amendment made in the Waqf Act, these properties are in danger.
Now let's understand what this provision is. Actually, 'Waqf By User' is a tradition, in which a property is considered a Waqf due to being used for Islamic religious or charitable purposes for a long time, even if it does not have a written document or registry.
Kapil Sibal said, 'Waqf by User' is a condition of Waqf. Understand it like this that I have a property and I want an orphanage to be built there, then what is the problem in this? I have land, I want to build it on it, in such a situation why will the government ask me to get it registered?
Second issue: Abolishing the status of Waqf property
Let us tell you that under the new law, if the District Collector identifies a property as government land, it will not be considered a Waqf property until the court gives its final decision. The Supreme Court objected to this provision and said that the Waqf status of the property should not be abolished during the Collector's investigation.
The court further proposed that the Collector can investigate, but its effect will not be implemented until the final decision is made.
Third issue: Appointment of non-Muslim members in Waqf Board and Council
Actually, the new law has a provision to include non-Muslim members in the Waqf Board and Central Waqf Council, which the court considered against religious autonomy.
The court asked the central government, "Will you allow the inclusion of Muslim members in Hindu religious trusts?" The court suggested that the permanent members of the board and council should be Muslims, although ex-officio members can be non-Muslims.
Today is the last day of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Bhutan. Before returning from Bh
The recent Malayalam film 'Lokah: Chapter 1' is doing great at the box office. The film is being
PM Modi recently made many big announcements on the occasion of Independence Day on 15 August. Th
Bollywood actress Anushka Sharma and Indian cricketer Virat Kohli are considered one of the count
Ashwin Kumar's animated film is doing wonders at the box office. The way the film has emerged as
There has been a ruckus in Karnataka over the release of famous actor Kamal Haasan's upcoming fil
Heavy rains have wreaked havoc in Bengaluru. People are in a bad condition due to heavy rains for
The Supreme Court on Monday pronounced its verdict on a petition challenging the validity of the
India's star fast bowler Jasprit Bumrah is often in the news, whether he plays or not. He was rel
Deepika Padukone trolled for wearing hijab, users said – Bindi is a wish and this is a compulsion?
Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh shared an ad on their social media pages. This ad was related
