Am I setting up my sites oldschool?

Posted on 16th Feb 2014 07:03 pm by admin

Ok,

When I create a site I open a basic template that I have created that consists of a css file an index page and a few php inserts for the header, nav and footer.

It works fine and I am happy with it but I keep seeing posts / comments on the net saying that all websites should be dynamically loaded etc and all content on pages should be database driven, so on and so on.

How does everyone else setup a basic site. I dont want to use a CMS like wordpress or joomla. I looked into CakePHP but apparently you should not use it unless you are creating a blog, forum etc. Here I was thinking CakePHP was a basic sort of framework that you can add features to.

I need help deciding the best way to do things, I have created sites that pull info from databases before but it was still all hand coded.

Help from anyone expereinced in this topic is very much needed

Your Answer:

Login to answer

Other forums

import table with dependency
Hi

What is the best way to import table back which has dependency?

SQL> cre

I think i'm using the syntax incorrectly
Hi Everyone!

I'm new to this forum and a newbie with PHP - I'm glad I found this site - I hop

Access website from only 1 computer...?
One of my customers wants his website to only be accessed by people in which they bought the website

Website Direction...
I recently used this code to try and make it so the page loads as http://www.domain.com/ when you ty

Send inserts to mysql thru port 80
Hi!

I have an application that must do some inserts in a mysql db. This db is behind a firewa

Run function every 5 mins ??
I have a function PostMessage()

How can I run it every 5 mins ??

Progress bar for webpage
Hi,
I want to implement a progress/waiting bar on my webpage - exactly the same thing that the Mi

Hits this week counter
I have a counter on my site that tracks hits, IP's, etc. into a mySQL database. It also includes the

Please Help my PHP Dating Function.
Hi everyone!

Well here is my code that displays this:

It works wonderful.

Typedef struct vs just struct
Anyone know the rationale for using typedef for structs when a struct is itself a typedef? I have s